|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 10, 2019 13:08:40 GMT -6
You know what really burns my ass, is i know from my research, studies of electricity and our universe that current flows from negative to positive yet every sorry physics or electrical engineering site on the planet refuses to depict their schematics the proper way. i just came from a few popular sites and even when discussing flyback diodes the proper way they refuse to acknowledge the proper current direction even though the fool just described the current through the flyback the correct way.
this is total insanity at it's finest. it is like they are totally brain washed like a military Marine thinking we are here to protect our country from invaders when the US Government is the actual perpetrator of these horrendous acts of terrorism.(Absolutely no disrespect to the Marines what so ever)
it is literally unbelievable seeing the amount of brain washing in this cabal of control that are so desperate to keep the lid on their rane of control that their little University paper degree minions literally freak out when an alternative is suggested. i could not even count the hundreds of times i am labeled a conspiracy theorist from average American citizens that would not know the truth if it fell out of the air and crushed their face. complete ignorance to their surrounding with no clue what so ever to the lies they have been engulfing down their misinformed throats.
it is no wonder the powerful elite are in control with a world full of wool covered sheep. so you wonder why i hate Corporate and Governments so much. WOOF !
MM
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 17, 2019 20:30:54 GMT -6
It doesn't take much to get started with the Figuera device. other members and readers can start small even with two or three inch long primaries. heck your part G can even be a few hundred va for those size cores. you do not have to start big at all as long as you are proving to yourself by verifying what i have already posted on this site. trust me, testing for yourself goes a long way in understanding this device and will definitely open your mind to other possibilities that were previously unknown to yourself and others.. you could even start a group project with friends and neighbors to split the cost of supplies which will be small for a small device. even including your kids which will advance them in electricity and physics far beyond what any sorry school can offer. i tell you now if i had kids you can bet your ass they would know everything about this device and literally blow their science teachers away hands down.
start thinking outside the box and to the future not the hear and now. Regards, Marathonman
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 19, 2019 14:59:41 GMT -6
One interesting fact of my build is that i have four parallel winding groups on my primaries with each group at .20 H inductance with a parallel equivalent inductance of .05 H inductance. if i take the remaining primaries in the set and series them i get .4 H inductance which is equal to my part G inductance of .38 to .4 H inductance which i find very interesting. also the resistance is at .65 ohms per group with a equivalent parallel resistance of .16 ohms per primary. with a series of 8 primaries gives a total of 1.28 ohms resistance per set N and S. just basically thinking out load but it is quite interesting that the inductance numbers line up without ever calculating the totals previously. this is of course using a 2 to 1 ratio. Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 25, 2019 9:59:55 GMT -6
People have to realize Figuera used solid pure iron cores which in it's purity has very little pinning sits and thus low hysteresis but with eddies. using modern day grain oriented silicon iron can substantially increase your output of your secondaries reducing both. granted a pure iron primary would be the most perfect electromagnet but as such are CRAZY expensive. trust me i know as the two previous sets i had that were either stolen or thrown in the trash by sorry roommates are right at 500 bucks. so for not much more i have 8 triplet sets of high quality grain oriented silicon iron cores that are much larger and substantially more output. at 10 kw i have lots of use for this system. at 15 kw must people on this planet can be completely off the grid which will cost somewhere in the range of 2,500 to 3,500 which is nothing compared to present day generators that are upwards of 10 grand. even then they are made to break down in less then 10 years. hell i have a few people i know that never used their generator except for the standard periodic starting and the piece of junk was dead in 10 years. screw that, build your own and be free from crazy energy cartel electric bills.
MM
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Oct 27, 2019 16:12:45 GMT -6
Hi all. I have not very good news. I'm doing the commutator like this: and this gives a triangle output wave. This: will give a sine wave. Somebody can say, huh, it isn't a problem, triangle wave will be transformed to sine because part G has inductance. Yes, I agree. But another big issue exists... The sine wave has more (much more) time to turn domains... Triangle wave hasn't...
So, how are saying in Russia - you will be stroking the cat against the wool, see the red area:
Ooops. Looks like I need to rebuild the commutator. Regards, creasysee
|
|
|
Post by cornboy on Oct 27, 2019 18:16:24 GMT -6
Hi Creasysee, i am not positive, but i think when using a commutator to signal your toroidal magnetic resistance, the way it is wired up, and the way your windings are distributed on the toroid, have more to do with the wave output.
Do you have any pics of your setup in action?
Warm Regards Cornboy
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 27, 2019 21:18:09 GMT -6
Hi Creasysee, i am not positive, but i think when using a commutator to signal your toroidal magnetic resistance, the way it is wired up, and the way your windings are distributed on the toroid, have more to do with the wave output.
I completely agree and nice observations. i do not understand your reasoning behind the picture of triangle because as the brush is traveling around the contacts, it will not be triangle from contact to contact besides your commutator can be wired differently to achieve the sine wave scenario. what kind of sine wave is yet to be seen as those tests are on you to perform. you have to remember the wave of each negative input into part G will have a gradual sine wave from an increase in inductive reactance from both even spots on part G where the primaries magnetic fields are even. unfortunately setbacks are apart of learning and research in uncharted territory. do as you must. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 31, 2019 10:33:54 GMT -6
One good thing about using a mechanical version of part G is the fact that the overlap and the ends on for longer are an automatic feature that is inherent in the brush rotation. no other steps are needed for the implementation of them like that of the electronic part G. sure mechanical breaks down after a while but if properly built it should last for a very long time. i see products made 50 to 80 years ago that are still working which is not so with electronics. it seems to me that the manufacturers have really gotten so disgustingly cheap on quality now a days and is very prevalent in the US where they tend to be a throw away society. i can not even count how many times i have bought something only to have it break or malfunction days from purchase. it is crap like this that infuriate me to know end. i sinceraly detest Corporate world to no end.
for these reason is the fact as to why i decided to make everything very robust like replacing the bearing clips with a very more robust enclosed bearing holder. this along with the double bearing motor i will be purchasing will ensure the longevity of this device. this will reduce the maintenance of the device to like every other year of brush replacement and the resurfacing of part G. MM
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 1, 2019 11:43:17 GMT -6
Member EmilP will be joining the builders group and heading up the 1932 Coutier device build. we have been exchanging information for about a year now on this device so Emil is well aware of all parameters involved. good luck Emil and welcome to the builders group. together all builder will make a difference in this screwed up world we call home.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 4, 2019 9:44:36 GMT -6
Congratulations, we have a new member "Hermes" that have joined the ranks. glad you can make it and welcome aboard. together we can make a difference in the world.
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Nov 8, 2019 15:26:46 GMT -6
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but Unfortunate circumstances transpired this week is forcing me to bow out of my pursuit of the Figuera device. the new owners of the property where i live are refusing to work with Veteran programs to help in my financial blight even though i have the funding lined up, i was informed today i must move. the only place i have available to me has storage for clothing only and little else other than personal items. i am literally being forced to sell everything i own as i have no other choice in the matter or other avenues to pursue as in short term storage. this has literally been my dream come true to pursue this device and i have put every ounce of energy, time, money i have to advance this into reality. apparently the powers that be have decided to take yet another of my dreams away from me which is literally destroying me, ripping my entire sole to the core. even as i write this being a man, i can not hold back the tears from the one thing in my life that gave me hope and passion is being ripped from my possession yet again.
i will hold off on making definite decisions as i know things and miracles do happen when you least expect it. as of right now if things do not change i will be forced to abandon my pursuit of the Figuera device which will force me to close down this website as there will literally be no reason for it to exist. i have given my heart and sole to this device in my pursuit in the last 6 years of not only a dream come true but a chance of a lifetime to show people of this world there is still people that care and want to make a difference.
with much regret, sorrow and pain. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Nov 14, 2019 13:18:01 GMT -6
Here i will present FACTS to the Figuera device to all those BONEHEADS on EF and OU that still think this device will not work with no such evidence, research or bench work to the contrary which is typical of them.
FACT; We live in a perpetual motion machine that will continue to rotate our earth for billions of years when we are long gone. FACT; Clemente Figuera had a working device in 1902 and presented a working model to the patent office. FACT; Clemente Figuera had a working device in 1908 and presented that working model to the Barcelona patent office. FACT; the conservation of energy does not pertain to a motional electric field and being so can not be shielded like that of gravity. FACT; the inverse square law/rule pertains to all fields/forces including magnetic fields FACT; an free standing electromagnet can only project out a field the length of the core it's self. FACT; an increase in voltage permits more current to flow. FACT; current flows from negative to positive. FACT; reducing resistance increases efficiency. FACT; resistors or resistance waste potential in the form of heat that is none recoverable. FACT; using multiple winding's reduces resistance and increases efficiency of the electromagnet increasing it's reaction time considerably. FACT; current travels in the same direction it was traveling in when released from it's stored state from the magnetic field. FACT; energy or potential is kinetic energy and retains it's spin direction irregardless of of how it was stored. FACT; inductors and coils store and release potential. FACT; inductors or coils release potential will add to an existing potential in a system raising the overall potential. FACT; changing the magnetic flux to current ratio will change the flow of current. FACT; opposing fields will increase the magnetic field line pressure compressing the lines of force to match that of a standard generator. FACT; opposing magnetic fields will never link to each other like that of a transformer. FACT; reducing or increasing the magnetic fields will create EMF in accordance with Faraday's laws of induction. FACT; secondary coils with current flowing will produce a Lenz law field that will oppose the change that created it. FACT; increasing the magnetic lines of force will increase the output. FACT; opposing fields can and will split an inductor in two halves which allow it to control current flow of two feeds. FACT; any DC potential given a rise and fall of current will attain a frequency thus will fall under inductive reactance. FACT; opposing primaries can and will induce virtual motion into a stationary secondary. FACT; Clemente Figuera did power his house lights, a 20 kilowatt motor and the street lights in front of his house with his device that was certified by the patent office to be in working condition that did what it said it did. BOTH TIMES !
These fact can NOT be denied by anyone which are directly applicable to the Figuera device. sure you can choose to ignore these facts you can also be a paid misinforment, a paid shill like on EF and OU but that is your sick problem all together, not the people that choose to believe in real facts which can be verified by everyone on the bench.
There is no burden of proof needed as Figuera already proved it TWICE. the burden of proof lies on the uninformed screaming it doesn't work. prove to me that it doesn't work which i might add you can not so please keep comments to your self and leave all the people pursuing this device in peace. oh, that's right you will not because your sorry useless pieces of crap that are to lazy from the money you get from Big Oil Companies that pay you to spread BS. the funny thing is once you attempt to prove me wrong you will find that i am right. research can be a powerful tool on the life of enlightenment and enrichment. it's quite simple, continue to think like them and die on a polluted planet or start thinking outside the box which will advance humanity and live a nice long life of freedom and prosperity.
i have posted my knowledge from research freely to the public and demand absolutely nothing in return. i have and will NEVER EVER post things or information that purposely or knowingly misinforms the readers, followers and builders. i am now and will always be true to this cause and will help anyone that wants to pursue this device in any way i can. that is why i have decided to keep this site available to everyone. as soon as i get back on my feet i will resume my building and testing. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Nov 22, 2019 11:33:51 GMT -6
I would like to personally thank Mr. Przywara for the small donation towards the building of the Figuera device. since i am presently in turmoil the donation will remain in the paypal account until the time i can resume building of this device. all donation i receive are not spent on personal dealings which i might add would be morally wrong. all donations received go towards the advancement of the Figuera device only and as such will remain there until the time i can return to the building status.
thank you again. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2019 2:40:11 GMT -6
Hi Guys :
Im starting here:
On building Figuera device is any success so far?
I had looked on electricity supply in Spain , Portugal in 1902.
There was supply under development in many places already established with 220V 50Hz
C Figuera made his device and plug his house on it. Load was at that time resistive means use of Edison globes.
I have study DC coils - solenoids and Magnetizing of core can be done with different voltage and current to full saturation of core following ways:
Low voltage high current or high voltage and low current with the same result of required magnetizing force.
therefore my approach to Figuera device is NOT to connect coils "S"and "N" in series as per Patent drawing but in the parallel I believe that someone who added lines of circuit connections did big mistake. If connected in paralel - it make the sense to me additional section can be added any time and power can be increased accordingly to used sections( N, Y, S) CF device is combination of DC magnetized cores and AC secondary output.
therefore Primary windings must be treated by this rule and secondary with transformer AC rules.
for magnet part S and N coils if they in series you are facing sum of resistance of each coil and you need to tune the sum to obtain magnetic saturation required (higher voltage )
if it is DC in Primary interrupted then Lenz's law bites back, therefore comutator must be a good quality, by the way I do admire your approach to this build it looks excellent! speed of commutator is dictating AC frequency on the secondary , if 60 Hz is required speed will be 3600 rpm , if 50Hz then 3000 rpm Assuming one complete wave cycle (for primaries) per revolution Not to use thick wire but rather thin and lots of it. resulting in required magnetizing
all electronic switching seams to me as asking for problem , as i have seen your coils it will be a bit of challenge to find switching mosfets to switch 340V @ 6A ( just my guess) therefore stick with your commutators and I love them!
Im starting with my build up with : Primary: silicone steel core for primary 36 mm x 68mm and 105mm long 0.57 mm magnet wire 2120 m on the bobbin with 138 ohm resistance secondary: silicone core 36 mm x 68 mm and 50 mm long ( following your rule 2:1) 1.1 mm magnet wire on the bobbin 142 m with 2.3 ohm resistance this is base triplets of device and this will repeat several times But first I need to construct comutator , any advice or direct instructions will be much appreciated. something that Im not clear yet do you think that drawn drop resistors been just nicore wire or it was sized inductors?
Best regards
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Nov 25, 2019 10:08:32 GMT -6
I am just curious if you have read all that i have posted of my research as it seems to me that you have not. there are many discrepancies in your above thought and approach so i would suggest going over what i have posted again if you have not done so. your cores do sound good but your primary coils planned have massive resistance which is no good and the fact that i hope you parallel the coils on the electromagnet otherwise their response time will not be able to react quick enough to part G's current changes. 2120 meters of wire and 138 ohm of resistance will render them almost useless in the Figuera device. also 23 awg wire is extremely small wire for the primaries which you will run into problems unless you use multiple strands in parallel. 17 awg for the secondaries seems a little small also but of course that depends on your output you want to achieve.
fact is there is no resistance wire in the Figuera device or "R" what so ever. he uses inductive reactance to control current flow plain and simple. lastly the reason Figuera used two sets of electromagnets and part G was to control each set of electromagnets separately yet in complete unison. your approach of the paralleling the primary sets is interesting approach and i would like to hear more on this. Buforn did expose the actual wiring a little more as he was trying to show a difference to the 1908 patent which is still patent infringement.
as for the comment on electronic switching, one must remember the transistor will only be on around 170 or so microseconds which is not enough time to get barely warm so the specifications of amperage can be dropped as per your thought.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|