|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 28, 2020 13:13:22 GMT -6
Finish epoxying the adjustment ring spacers and the 10 awg square wire on part G's core. have spent last few hours sanding and buffing the wire to remove the excess epoxy to a very glass like finish for the brushes to travel on. the dark spots are just the reflection from above giving the wire the appearance of having junk on it. it is actually quite shinny and very smooth. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2020 16:16:29 GMT -6
Hi MM
I can see that you are steaming ahead very well
The job looks very nice
Would you please explain why you have decided on so many contact points on copper wire ? And why two brushes? Is the secondary brush just for balance purposes?
I would think that pictures shows that you have some steel core and wind copper around it to create commutator as per simplified drawing of CF device That will be inductor?
Perhaps I do not understand you pictures
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 28, 2020 20:30:37 GMT -6
I would say something smart wise but i will be nice.
if you would have done your homework you and everyone else would have realized that CF used a rotating brush on an active inductor and is not a commutator. as the brush rotates as did Figuera's, it would be impossible for the roller brush to make contact with the commutator bars spread so far apart. it would have to be winding's right next to each other as to magnetically link to each other as i have been so diligently posting.
if you would have observed from the prior two videos on part G from Hannon and Creasysee's in which they followed my advice, you would have realized that the inductive reactance from the winding's is what is the controller of current. it is the reverse emf from the winding's that magnetically link to the system.
the core you so observed helps the magnetic field in opposition to the original current flow and helps conserve the magnetic field in part G. the core as i have been screaming about for 6 years has to be closed core in able to provide this function of part G. it also helps regulate the potential coming out of part G along with the amplification to the rising primaries and the secondary feed back.
the core with the winding's on it IS THE INDUCTOR Figuera so talks about in his patent and it just so happens to have a commutator driven by the motor for the secondary feed back into part G since this device IS DC OPERATED.
the problem lies in your understanding that the so called simplified drawing actually exist in real life when CF even says it is just a drawing for the understanding of the device only.
what a really sad day in Figuera land and if this is all i have to inform i might as well close this web site down and do it on my own as not a single person actually understands the Figuera device at all let alone what i have been posting for years. all of you get an F for failure to not only understand the device but to also do your own research.
PS. the secondary brush is for the secondary feed back into part G and yes for balance. i think i will pull all of my hair out tonight.
Quote; "That will be inductor?" No shit, i am glad you have finally come to that conclusion. how long did it take ?
Quote; "Perhaps I do not understand your pictures" NO ! you do not understand the PATENT, PERIOD !
READ THE TECH THREAD FOR A CHANGE !
My inductor is of my own special C core design to attain a flat surface on the C to attain the highest magnetic field possible from Bridgeport Magnetics. yes it is a closed core where the other C is mounted to the base.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2020 0:24:12 GMT -6
Thank you for your kind reply
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2020 0:25:07 GMT -6
Now it is clear to me that you choose c core with air gap to use for active inductor
Also now it is clear to me that you choose active inductor that will have many contact points with brush
That is ok with me if that your representation of original device and it is entirely your way and nobody is taking this away from you
I have chosen for now toroidal steel core and 8 contacts from it after all you are not sure how many contact points had originally Figuera You are guessing your way arround and this is ok with me to
I would advice you to cut down overwhelming informations in your post and cut it down to the facts simple understanding by newbies in the posts
I will go forward with my way of interpretations of patent after all this is picture from oscilloscope that drives me forward
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2020 0:36:21 GMT -6
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2020 0:39:10 GMT -6
By the way this is output from secondary coil on prototype
|
|
peter
New Member
Posts: 24
|
Post by peter on Aug 29, 2020 12:28:34 GMT -6
Wow MM that is a very nice part G i say... 3d prints look good to, is that PLA or ABS you are using?
How many loops did you put on there 42 ?
Great work man, you're a bit ahead of me with this one..
Kind regards,
PS. i think a lot of people DO understand actually. you explained this very well and very often.
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 29, 2020 14:29:49 GMT -6
Thank you Peter but i still feel like pulling all my hair out. for instance where in my core does anyone see an air gap. you don't because i do not have an air gap anywhere in my closed C core that i have mentioned 1000 times before. the core has to be closed core to preserve the magnetic flux. if it is open, massive flux losses will occur. also the comments of "You are guessing your way around and this is ok with me to" are infuriating to say the least. i have spent 6 fucking years of my life devoted to the truth of this device and it just bounced off foolish peoples heads like a ball. you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.
as for my 3D prints, they would be Tuff PLA as all i have is a stock Ender 3 Pro with a BL Touch bed leveler. no all metal hot end just yet. i have 46 loops on my part G but remember i can adjust my brushes in or out to find the sweet spot of current window then remove any winding's i do not need. this is also why i used adjustable commutator brushes to adjust the secondary feed back if i so needed. i still need to find an AC motor to attach to the secondary which helps in the feed back to keep timing in check along with the resistive loads.
the reason why i chose to go a special C core is the area involved with the inductance or inductive reactances. i have right at 11 inches per loop so i am sure i have enough inductance. the original replicator used a 100 amp alternator core in one continuous wind which according to calculation put it at 50 winds per half which is about what Figuera probably used in his EI core. leaving things adjustable is the smartest thing to do when in slightly unknown territory guided by research and BENCH WORK..
the reason i am not using a alternator core is the fact that there were timing issues, balancing issues and stray inductances on the non active side. Figuera used an EI core in his original but i did not want to deal with the losses involved and the pain in extending the center leg to accommodate the winding's needed. my C core design is just right for me and then some.
I try to post in different ways so to get different angles so people will understand but it has to be read first, understood then bench tested which is a whole other ball game. Quote; "PS. i think a lot of people DO understand actually. you explained this very well and very often." thank you but sometimes i just cant tell. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 30, 2020 11:34:33 GMT -6
I also hate to be so overly redundant but i think it is necessary on certain points to raise the level of awareness. in my book if i read something and it is repeated many times i think the author is relaying the importance of the specific topic in question. i also reread many things over and over if i do not understand it, then after some time it becomes more clear to me and i am able to visualize it's movements or actions.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 30, 2020 13:09:16 GMT -6
Working on test bed of two standard 100 watt lights for a visualization of just what part G does, and that is control current flow of two feeds 180 degrees out from each other using inductive reactance in complete unison. i am waiting on a replacement fan/heat sink to replace the one i blew which is for the 100 volt line bridge rectifier cooling. i now have 100 volt line and a 12 volt line at my disposal to aide in testing of this device. the led volt/current meter will let me know just how much is being draw at the supply at all times.
the testing and reveal of my part G will be included after the description of the device in a video which i explain details of the 1908 device as per the patent not the drawing that everyone seems so bewildered by. i wanted to release the video on the patent explanations to Youtube but after some thought i decided to back up all facts and descriptions in the video with a bomb shell visual of part G in all it's glory.
6 long years of destruction of property, theft, hatred, ridicule, misinformation and down right disgusting behavior from forum members and so called researchers have lead me to the most finest time in my life.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 31, 2020 19:43:20 GMT -6
Peter;
I am working on the very small slots in the brush holder sleeves that slide back and fourth in the cutouts on the brush holder rotor. i will drill two sets of holes top and bottom and use a tap so i can screw them down. this will hold the brush and sleeve to the rotor so i get no surprises at 3600 rpm yet give me the ability to adjust the current window to my triplets.
the original replicator said to make everything adjustable and i see the wisdom in that message clearly. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2020 23:25:25 GMT -6
Hi guys I had to purchase cheap CNC router and start producing bobbins
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2020 23:28:50 GMT -6
Result is material been cut economically without mistake now I can start gluing bits
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2020 23:33:30 GMT -6
Not only bobbin material but also new commutator assembly that will complete “G” part of it is here
|
|