|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 25, 2019 8:42:16 GMT -6
This thread is dedicated to the operational information that i have gathered over the last 5 or 6 years of study, research and bench work of the 1908 patent. in your journey you will find that the patent pic below is not what the first impression leads you to believe. reading between the lines you will realize that not only does "R" not exist that fact that the commutator bars do not also. since i am new to this please give me time to upload information pertaining to the Figuera device. thanks. as you read through my later posts you will realize why "R" and Commutator bars do not exist.   The applied patent for 20 years is requested upon a “NEW GENERATOR OF ELECTRICITY, so-called “FIGUERA” of variable excitation, designed to produce electrical currents for industrial applications without using neither driving force, nor chemical reactions. The machine is essentially characterized by two series of electromagnets which form the inductor circuit, between whose poles the reels of the induced are properly placed. Both circuits, remaining motionless, induced and inductor, are able to produce a current induced by the constant variation of the intensity of the magnetic field forcing the excitatory current (coming at first from any external source) to pass through a rotating brush which, in its rotation movement, is placed in communication with the commutator bars or contacts of a ring distributor or cylinder whose contacts are in communication with a resistance whose value varies from a maximum to a minimum and vice versa, according with the commutator bars of the cylinder which operates, and for that reason the resistance is connected to the electromagnets N by one of its side, and the electromagnets S at the other side, in such a way that the excitatory current will be magnetizing successively with more or less strength to the first electromagnets, while, oppositely, will be decreasing or increasing the magnetization in the second ones, determining these variations in intensity of the magnetic field, the production of the current in the induced, current that we can use for any work for the most part, and of which only one small fraction is derived for the actuation of a small electrical motor which make rotate the brush, and another fraction goes to the continuous excitation of the electromagnets, and, therefore, converting the machine in self-exciting, being able to suppress the external power which was used at first to excite the electromagnets. Once the machinery is in motion, no new force is required and the machine will continue in operation indefinitely. This thread is not for general posting by members.
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 25, 2019 10:09:48 GMT -6
So lets sum up the the information that was presented so far on the Figuera device from past forum posts i was on.
------------PRIMARIES------------
1. primaries need to have low self induction as fast response time in essential. to much self induction will decrease the speed of the electromagnets rise time and lower the overall magnetic field strength.
2. lowest ohms as possible since part G controls the currant flow not the primaries and we need the highest magnetic field possible within the limits of the core material. this also increases the reaction speed of the electromagnets.
3. the coil winding's need to span almost the entire length of the core end to end not leaving huge gaps. not winding the entire length of the core will reduce the length of magnetic field from the end of the electromagnet which will decrease field line compression.
4. the primaries have to be larger than the secondaries and at no time equal or smaller. remembering square of the distance. i suggest a 2 to 1 ratio. to small and the magnetic field line compression can not be maintained.
5. primaries need to be separate from the secondaries as eddy currants will interfere with the primaries main function and create losses and heat. do not put the primaries and secondaries on the same core. the core of the primaries can be solid but it is HIGHLY recommended to use laminated secondaries as AC is induced.
6. be butted up next to secondaries with as little as gap as possible, use resin on ends. gapping here for tuning should be used as little as possible as this decreases the magnetic field at the collision point. use this gap as the last resort to balance the opposing field primaries. ? EDIT;**this is being tested and might change in the future with some new evidence i have come across and will post the results when completed.** there might be a gap after all in order for the secondary opposing field to clear the secondary.
7. be properly secured as massive pressures will make parts fly at extreme velocities with possible risk of injury.
8. use of N/N primaries opposing fields to attain double strength E field as N/S will not work due to opposing currants and joining together to form one magnetic field which is not what we want..
9. each electromagnets should be exact copies of each other, with the same weight, size, width, length and definitely the same winding count. this will make the balancing at the collision point much easier to attain.
----------SECONDARIES---------- EDIT; The secondaries can be larger then that of the primaries to take advantage of the bulging flux field of the primaries. this will increase the secondary output.
1. core thickness to match primary.
2. wound with thicker wire according to load requirements with headroom as does primaries.
3. winding span almost entire length end to end of core not leaving huge gaps.
4. can be series and or paralleled to attain voltage and currant requirements.
5. use of second secondary to power it self to replace losses in part G from wire, heat and core losses.
6. each electromagnets should be exact copies of each other, with the same weight, size, width, length and definitely the same winding count.
----------Part G------------
1. Core va rating must exceed load rating (each half Calc Separate) plus additional head room of no less than 500 va. the use of a good quality closed core is highly suggested.
2. be wound with thicker wire than primaries remembering that the wire rating is the sum of lower smaller branches plus headroom. since patent says (commutator bars ) it is actually the wire on the core as the brush rotates making contact with the wire loops. thicker wire can also be reground when needed after years of service. not so with electronic switching. remember part G becomes the power supply after starting.
3. use a closed core system, ie. toroid type core which is good for electronic switching and feedback from primaries is of great importance mirroring primaries opposing function and proper magnetic field rotation. C core would be another option that us much easier to wind but slightly less efficient. an EI core can be used if the center leg is wide enough to rotate a brush. with electronic switching this is not a problem.
4. secure wire to core as relative high rotational speeds will be attained. again not a problem with electronic switching but may induce hum from the AC like qualities given to DC.
5. use high quality brushes with proper pressured springs as wear longevity is essential. also suggest precision grinding/polishing the wire on your controller to alleviate any high spots reducing sparking and reduces brush ware.
6. brush rotation of part G causes dynamic induction allowing currant manipulation through magnetic core saturation/inductance/impedance change.
------------TIMING-------------
1. timing is very crucial in the Figuera device, primaries are to be kept in complete unison at all times
2. timing of primaries are 180 degrees from each other, as one is rising the other is falling.
3. at no time is the primaries reduced to below half way and NEVER ZERO as induction will be lost from the reducing electromagnet falling to the output of the rising electromagnet reducing the output to less than 1/4 of original output or less. primaries are reduce only enough to clear the secondary then back to full potential.
4. collision wall of opposing electromagnets has to just clear secondary to attain proper B x V Motional field function as does maintaining complete unison all while retaining 80 to 90 % of original field strength.
5. when using electronic switching make sure the end taps are on for three to four times longer as the inductive roll off is essential for proper secondary AC wave form. if converting for DC usage then this requirement is not needed.
----------DEVICE----------
1. this device is DC operated. AC will not work in this device as reversing polarities will cause the destruction of the duel Motional Electric Fields as will all Cemf/bemf ect. also the magnetic fields take to long to build up with AC. having to flip the domains from zero to peak is very time consuming and will not work in the Figuera device.
this device uses DC and given frequency through the process of increase and decrease of induction. it is inductive reactance only initiated by induction not current change.
MM
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 25, 2019 10:18:39 GMT -6
Part G
When a person dives into the research of part G and studies Inductors, Inductance and Inductive Reactance you will quickly realize that every video and material posted by Physics Professors, Students and University Physics dept all point to the same conclusion and outcome that a steady state DC does not produce Inductance. While this is basically true it is NOT the complete information on Induction and DC current flow to say the least. If a person was to some how alter the aspects of DC to mimic the actions of AC current rise and fall then that person would then be able to attain Inductive reactance with DC which in turn control the flow of current.
Within the FACTS of this post I will in fact show that DC can and will control current flow which will then fall under the realm of Inductive Reactance.
As stated by Universities in their postings and publication on Inductive Reactance it is stated on most if not all that and alternating current flow (AC) or any change in current will produce Inductive Reactance. Again I will replete that if you missed it ANY CHANGE IN CURRENT FLOW IS INDUCTIVE REACTANCE. For the remainder of thesis I will prove that the Figuera device utilizes Inductive Reactance to control current flow in Part G which in turn controls the current flow allowed through both set N and set S electromagnets.
The teaching of Inductive Reactance in every College and university around the world from Physics professors is a completely one sided thought that a change in current flow is the only way to control inductance. While this may be true for a completely static Inductor system it is completely false and does not apply to an active Inductor. Test research conducted myself on my bench concluded that when DC current is applied to an Inductor it will in fact have Inductive Reactance for the time constant of that said circuit until steady state current flow is achieved. When first applied the current is low from the Reactance of the magnetic field reversal to the original flow of current up to the point of steady flow. While this is a very short live Reactance we will have to change the perimeters of the circuit to get Inductive Reactance on a continuous basis.
In Inductive Reactance we have a current change that causes a change in Inductance known with AC. This is cause and effect and is what is taught in all universities around the world. What is not taught is with an active Inductor we have a change in Inductance, the magnetic flux to current ratio as the brush rotates, that changes the current flow in a DC system which is the cause and effect. Within the time constant of said circuit we change the loop count of either increasing or decreasing we are changing the magnetic flux within that circuit and according to Faraday in 1831 we will in fact produce an EMF and according to the Len Law it will oppose the original current flow. Any time we have a rise or fall of current flow what we end up with is giving the current frequency so within the active Inductor controller using Inductance to change current flow thus frequency has just been given to DC which now falls under the realm of Inductive Reactance.
Again, at any time we change the loop count on the core with a steady state DC current flow within the time constant of that circuit we will in FACT change the magnetic flux to current ratio which according to Faraday’s Laws of Induction in 1831 states any increase or decrease of magnetic flux will produce an EMF. Since the EMF was created within said circuit, it according to the LENS Law will oppose the original current flow that created the magnetic field in the first place. Each time a loop is added that loop magnetically links to the circuit and that magnetic linking increases the magnetic flux associated with that circuit. so any increase or decrease in magnetic linking to the circuit producing EMF is in exact accordance with Faraday’s Laws on Induction and the Lenz Law to oppose. Thus any change in current flow gives way to frequency irregardless if it is AC or ANY such change in current flow. Inductive Reactance initiated by inductance which in turn causes a current change thus given frequency thus Inductive Reactance.
So according to these findings Part G Inductive controller in the Figuera device does just that. As the brush rotates in a circular manor having two feeds, one from set N and the other from set S will have a north face opposing fields at the positive brush. This opposing fields basically split the inductor in two halves of opposing field allowing the Inductive controller to control two separate feeds 180 degrees from each other yet remain in complete unison through the entire rotation of the brush. As one side of the brush is increasing the magnetic flux to current ratio, decreasing the current flow to that set of electromagnets. the other side is reducing the magnetic flux to current ratio increasing it’s current flow to that set of electromagnets.
So the basic concept and operation of the Inductive controller Part G is as follows
1. two pole configuration N & S to regulate the output of it’s winding’s and the draw of the starting power supply.
2. Split the feeds into two allowing the control of two current feeds, one rising in current flow, one reducing in current flow in complete unison.
3. Store and release potential into the system to off set the rising side potential drop as it is storing into the magnetic field for the next half cycle. This basic operation is conserving, preserving or recycling if you will the excitation side of the system potential.
4. Forward bias the rising side of the system to allow more current to flow to replace the reducing electromagnet’s reduced magnetic field line pressure. This forward biasing allows the voltage to be increased in the system which in turn allows more current to flow boosting the rising electromagnet field line pressure which maintains a steady output.
5. Amplification, with the opposing fields in place is the perfect avenue to introduce the secondary feed back into the system thus elevates part G to the sole power supply of the system as the starting supply is removed. Also to replace losses occurred in the system and give rise to amplification to the rising primary. part G can be looked upon as an amplifier, the three reduced potentials combined in part G to amplify the signal to the rising electromagnet.
just try that without part G's core and tell me how it works for ya! part G has many functions that can NOT be simply replaced with electronics thus the use of a closed core with Inductive winding's is a must.
Since all coils on earth have Inductance both parts of each half of the system (Increasing, Decreasing) are a vital part and function of the system. When the reducing half of part G is reducing at the same time the reducing set of electromagnet are being reduced also. Since they are not connected in Mutual Induction their individual reduced magnetic field potential is released into the system and combine in Part G like two batteries in series. With the added secondary feedback into part G, these three potential combine to raise the voltage in the system to offset the rising side of the system that is storing into the magnetic field increasing it’s field line pressure. This added boost from the secondary feedback gives the rising electromagnet the needed field line pressure to replace the reducing electromagnet drop in pressure that is needed to get the sweeping action across the secondary. This added boost is an amplification in potential to the rising electromagnet which then is able to maintain the required pressure between the two opposing electromagnets to maintain required pressure needed for your output.
Electromagnets
When Clement Figuera designed his device the first one was a rotating device that was possibly shaped like the egg of Columbus. Later in his patents he refined the device to stationary yet to him it still needed further refinement. These were his 1902 patents which were modeled, as his 1908 patent, after the rotating generator of that time period. Every rotating generator produced by man has the unavoidable need to rotate a huge mass of iron which is plagued with massive clogging effects as it approach and recede from the stater. This clogging effects if the unavoidable reverse torque imposed on the rotor which is the Lenz Law hard at work. This reverse torque is why it takes 150 % power to rotate the generator to receive 95 % power from the system when power is drawn from it. What amazes me is this is all man has achieved in the last 150 years of progress or at least what the powers that be will lead us to believe is so which in reality is a complete fabricated lie to maintain their cash flow from our hands to theirs.
In the Figuera device he studied a rotating generator and came up with a solution that allowed him to forgo the rotation, eliminating the cogging effects from the Lenz law which leaves the stationary generator much, much more efficient then that of standard junk on the market. He figured out that with opposing electromagnets he could raise the field line pressure to match that of the standard generator north and south high intensity field without the two fields combining as one field. With these opposing primaries he then reduced one electromagnet while increasing the other to get the sweeping action across the secondary that was positioned in between them.
When the primaries are powered up the secondary has no residual magnetization so the primaries have to polarize the secondaries. in doing so when current starts to flow in the secondary and the load the secondary will form an opposing field that will oppose the original current flow. When this happens the secondary and the primaries part ways and it is just the relative motion of the primaries that induce motion into the secondary. This action is similar to a squirrel cage motor when the primaries polarizes the secondary bars and current begins to circulate a second field is formed opposing this change. They then part ways, which then it is just the relative movement of the primaries that induce the secondary. After that no power is transferred to the secondary. after polarization takes place there ceases to be any such magnetic linking between the primary and secondary remain so throughout it's operation.
With the secondary opposing field formed that is between the opposing primary north face fields it is shoved from side to side by the rising electromagnet. To get the sweeping action the entire length of the secondary, one primary is reduced and in doing so creates an electric field in the process while the rising primaries shove these opposing fields of the secondary and the reducing primary across the secondary. Again with this newly created field the opposing secondary is at the same time shoved across this electric field to one side of the secondary giving the illusion of motion to this electric field thus creating a Motional EMF in the secondary. At no time after polarization is energy transferred to the secondary as it is just the relative motion of the sweeping primaries that induce the secondaries.
This whole action of this device falls squarely on the shoulders of the Inductor Controller Part G that has just enough inductance to get the sweeping action of the primaries. The reducing primary is reduced with just enough inductance to sweep the entire secondary and to just clear the secondary then back to full potential as the other primary is reduced to get the sweeping action to the other end of the secondary. If this action is not followed then the output of the secondary will be reduced substantially as will the use of a 1 to 1 ratio of primary to secondary. The field line pressure required can NOT be maintained if the primaries are not substantially larger then that of the secondaries and is shown in the 1908 patent which was confirmed on my research bench to be true.
“R” and Commutator Bars
as per the 1908 patent the use of resistance and wording in the system is used to control current flow. As stated specifically “R” is drawn in it’s elementary manor to facilitate the comprehension of the device only as is the commutator bars. Why people are still so darn determined to hold on to the illusion that “R” exists as a separate entity is completely insane beyond belief. “R” in it’s higher form is the actual Inductive resistance of the wire wrapped around the core as the brush rotates. The very notion that an astute Physics Professor and Forestry Ranger would use heat death resistor in a fabulous device like this is nothing short of pure ignorant insanity. Especially considering the potential once converted to heat is NON recoverable as in lost forever. Their is no “R” and it does NOT exist as a separate entity yet resides between the wires as the brush rotates around the Inductor controller part G.
Commutator bars are in the same class as “R” and again are not used in the original device yet is fine for the description of the device for the comprehension of it’s operation as was “R”. why would an Astute Physics Professor use very thick and large chunks of copper bar embedded then turn around and connect them with puny little low current wires. This again falls under the complete insanity realm which is the complete opposite of what a builder of the most fantastic device in this century would do. The contacts Figuera is referring to is the actual thick wires looped around the core with a brush that rotates making contact with more then one at a time. If the so called commutator bars were used with the roller brush Figuera shows in the patent then it is impossible for the roller brush to make contact to more then one commutator bar at a time. Since part G was made in Germany and it just so happens that Zeiss was in Germany the likelihood of Part G being made by the experts in the industry Zeiss and it’s partner Abby is well into the high 95 plus percentile reality that Zeiss did in fact make the controller. Another compelling clue was Abby of Zeiss used roller brushes in his E I controller to control the light in his microscopes that he invented. It just so happens that the drawing of the 1908 Figuera patent shows a roller brush in all it’s glory.
My conclusion of my research is “R” does NOT exist as does the commutator bars and were just used to get the description of the device and it’s operation across to the patent office only and to obscure it's true form.
To plan your Figuera device build you need to decide on what your power requirements are then calculate the secondaries needed for that output without overheating in the process with additional headroom. When the amount of flux is calculated to maintain your output as per your secondary count that amount is split between your primaries so each primary is accountable for half the flux of the secondary output. Then Part G is calculated as each half of the system is calculated separately with added headroom remembering that the reducing primaries are only taken down to “just” clear the secondary then back to full potential. Another thing is to remember is the brush is rotating at 3600 Rpm for the US and 2500 Rpm for other Countries and when the full power of the system is flowing at the peak of the rising electromagnet it is only on for microseconds at a time which is not near enough time to cause heating of the wire.
Another thing to remember that Part G becomes the power supply so wind accordingly assuring part G can handle all the sums of the lower parts plus headroom just like any standard power supply would need to be. The use of thicker wire reduces IR2 losses occurred in part G increasing it’s efficiency of not only part G but used in the primaries also lowers the resistance of the primaries allowing them to react as quick as they can from the current changes of Part G allowing them to do their specific job of being an electromagnet. Remember part G controls the current flow NOT the primaries. Over redundancy and added resistant losses is not needed.
So from this report the question will arise Can part G be wound on another type of core and the answer to that is definitely 'YES' as long as the core is a closed core so the magnetic fields can be conserved, preserved, recycled or confined if you will within the core and not lost through flux leakage as with an open or straight core. As long as the brush can rotate in a circle making contact with more then one contact at a time and with the proper amount of Inductive Reactance for current reduction you will be just fine.
Regards,
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 25, 2019 10:20:30 GMT -6
How can the Figuera Device be Self Sustaining.
One has to realize that the Inducing part of the system is actually a separate entity from the induced/load system. it boils down to a set of magnetic fields acting upon another magnetic field to induce an EMF in that part of the system.
you can not use AC from the fact that reversing the fields is not only very time consuming but has to much wasted power trying to flip all the domains in the opposite direction fighting self inductance, reluctance, hysteresis and eddy currents which all end up as wasted heat, wasted power and wasted time. by the time a decent amount of domains are flipped the direction of current is reversed and the whole battle of flipping begins again. this is why Generator designers use DC to excite their electromagnets as the use of DC is many times more efficient then if one was to use AC. no domains to flip in DC so no massive losses occur plus the magnetic fields are many times more intense.
the primaries as we all know in the Figuera device are North face opposing electromagnets fore which Figuera chose for very specific reasons. each electromagnet being a north face electromagnet will have the same spin direction when side by side but when place end to end with a secondary in between, the spin direction will be opposite. each time the increasing electromagnets shoves the reducing electromagnet to the other side of the secondary it not only flips the poles of the secondary, it is actually shoving it out of the secondary into it's own core. the reason for doing this is if any magnetic field lines from the reducing electromagnet is present in the secondary, since it's magnetic field is opposite direction, it will oppose the induction within the secondary electromagnet reducing the output by the amount present in the secondary.
In a Transformer you basically have two coils feeding off of one magnetic field circulating around the core which is reflected back to the source drawing more current. the coils are actually magnetically linked to one another so the shared path of magnetic field will be reduced which will cause the current draw to increase at the source. all the power must be supplied directly by the shared flux passing both coils. if you avoid sharing you avoid the drain on the source.
In the Figuera device in order to avoid this sharing of the magnetic flux thus a drain on the source, the electromagnetic being opposing in nature remain separate thus do not link to each other and also do not link to the secondary creating the EMF after polarization. the opposing fields of the primaries and the opposing field in the secondary (lenz law) will make direct linking to each other literally impossible thus avoiding the magnetic linking as with a transformer. what we have is two competing fields so the drain on the original source is substantially reduced which result in a greater output. the effects that need to be looked at are a change in flux direction that takes place in the secondary. the secondary cares not how the change in flux took place as long as it is changing thus faster it changes the more the output. the magnetic flux from each electromagnet must occupy the secondary completely in order to attain a greater output then be removed completely in reducing from the increasing electromagnets magnetic field. this cyclic process must take place completely or the output will suffer drastically as will an incomplete sweep of the secondary.
as I stated earlier there are other reasons for using north face electromagnets. at the collision point where the opposing fields meet, since they are of positive pressure, will bulge out from the collision which then extends out considerably on both sides. what this does is extend the the flux region fore which the secondary coil can be wound to utilized this extended flux region gaining a much larger output. a much larger coil or multiple coils can be constructed to take advantage of this extended flux region.
the placement of another core coil set N and S within this region can also take advantage of this bulging effects. it will not only add to the other induced secondary but allow any magnetic field dissimilarities between the coils sets to be equalized in flux intensities matching the one next to it.
according to Sparky Sweet he stated that once the electromagnets are at full power they can not store any more magnetic flux into the magnetic field as per the amount of current. the current draw of the electromagnets will be reduced to just the IR2 losses of the wire to maintain the magnetic field. if the current is not being utilized by the electromagnet it will just circulate within the exciting system (Part G and Electromagnets) to maintain the magnetic field pressure. when the electromagnets are increased that increase will be supplied by the inducing system from the stored potentials being released from the reducing side of the exciting system and the secondary feed back. each reducing primary released potential is combined with the reducing side of part G within Part G with the secondary feed back which forward biases the rising primary to off set it's potential drop from storing into the magnetic field giving rise to amplification replacing the reducing electromagnets reduced potential to the rising electromagnet.
Part G is constantly storing and releasing potential within the system that allows the system to sustain it's self not wasting it's potentials like that of a heat death resistor. Inductors are very much more efficient then that of a resistor by creating a stored and released magnetic fields within Part G as the brush rotated that resist the original current flow through it's two feeds. This allows the inductor to manipulate the current flow with almost zero losses.
once the electromagnets are up to running conditions the effort to reduce one and increase the other is so insignificant thus taking very, very little effort to sweep the secondary with the flick of a brush in rotation from a small motor. the primaries are wound to be specifically electromagnets to react as quickly as possible to any such change in current from part G. the winding of the primaries as electromagnets as such will reduce the IR2 losses of the coil increasing it's efficiency lost from heat and induction.
Since Figuera used DC to excite his system there is no reversal of domains, no massive hysteresis losses, no massive eddy currents and little to no heat losses. When you factor in all the losses associated with your standard generator like all the above combined with the massive reverse torque as the rotor approaches and recedes from the stator, it can easily be seen just how the Figuera stationary generator can and will be self sustaining, maintaining it's self and the load once started.
any failure to get this device running is not the failure of the inventor but falls squarely on the replicator. Anyone skilled in the arts will get this device working thus anyone NOT skilled in the arts will not get this device running. Just because of the failure of the replicator to achieve a running device does not mean the inventor did not achieve his goal. Figuera had this device in fact running his house and presented the patent office with a working model so trust me when I say any such failure to do so falls squarely on the replicators lack of skilled arts.
Regards,
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 25, 2019 11:25:18 GMT -6
You might ask yourself how in the world can Inductance control current flow. well from the previous posts i am sure you have a much better idea of how it works. as the brush rotates while making contact with two or more contacts in a make before break scenario to eliminate sparking. as the brush advances one loop is added on one side and subtracted from the other, increasing the magnetic flux on one side and decreasing on the other. this magnetic flux increase or decrease magnetically links to the loops that produce an opposing EMF that opposes the original current flow. each time the brush rotates 1/2 turn set S or set N increase or decrease in current flow to either set of electromagnets. below is the magnetic linking of the loops as the brush rotates. most web sites only show the outer magnetic field and never actually show the linking of the loops that are added. the below pics are the actual linking as a loop is added or subtracted increasing or decreasing the magnetic flux to current ratio.  
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 25, 2019 12:53:45 GMT -6
Problems in the Figuera device; little to no Output.
Most of the problem people are experiencing with no output in the 1908 Figuera device can be attributed to a few common mistakes that were made when building the device.
1. when building the primaries and secondaries most if not all are simply building the primaries the same size as the secondaries which is a very big mistake. When testing this on the bench I realized the magnetic fields will only project out from the core the exact length of the core it’s self. I tested this with high power neodymium magnets and witnessed for myself that the magnetic field projected from a two inch neo magnet was exactly two inches. To take this a step further I then wired a three inch core with 8 layers of winding’s then powered with one to two amps. To my surprise the magnetic field projected was exactly three inches on the nose. I then upped the amperage to 10 amps which was putting the core in pretty much total saturation. The field projected a length of 3.2 to 3.3 inches which I now firmly believe a magnetic field will only project out the length of the core it’s self. This is of course dealing with the mono fields in free space only, ie one end and as such abides by the Inverse Square Law.
What this leads to is the people that built their cores with a 1 to 1 ratio will in fact get almost NOTHING out of their triplets because the magnetic field can barely be detected out three inched from the core which when a secondary is in place can be almost non detectable on the other side of the secondary where the opposing primary collides to compress the field lines. If you then try to compress the field lines to get the sweeping action across the secondary the field line pressure is taken to low and induction will fail. The fact that the sweep is severely reduced in this process is part of this problem also.
On the other hand a 2 to 1 ratio the primaries I made 6 inches long and the secondary 3 inches the magnetic field projects out 6 inches and can then be compressed and reduced to get the sweeping action across the secondary all while maintaining proper field line pressure through the entire sweep. This was also verified on the bench and found to be a complete success with a full sweep across the secondary all while maintaining field line pressures.
2. having to many winds on part G can also have a detrimental effect on the output. as we all know the Cemf produced within Part G active Inductor (Lenz Law) reduces the original current flow as the brush rotates. If there are to many winds the primaries are reduced to far and the loss of field line pressure will occur between the two primaries. The pressure has to be maintained even when reduced through the entire sweeping process otherwise the output will plummet considerably. There is no reason not to use thick wire which lowers the IR2 losses thus equates to the most efficient Inductor possible.
3. the peak of the primaries with the secondary feed back has to match that of the other primary. If either primary peak is much higher then the other Induction will fall to the rising primary.
balance of the primaries is a complete must as is the entire system. The magnetic fields of both primaries has to match exactly which can be adjusted either through Part G or with taking some very thin shims to slightly weaken the strongest primary to match the lower field primary. The whole goal when building the primaries is to build them EXACT copies of each other so balancing can be attained much easier.
These are just a few things that come to mind when I see people failing to get an output from their triplets then ranting the device does not work. One big realization should be kept in your mind is the secondary feed back into Part G causes the forward biasing of part G to increase the voltage to the rising primaries that allow more current to flow to replace the reduce primaries field line pressure. This added field line pressure on the rising primaries allows the device to maintain it’s pressure through the entire sweep. If the secondary feed back is not in place the device output will be reduced by the amount of the reducing primary. If you reduce your primary 30 percent then your output will be reduced 30 percent.
The whole purpose is to just get the reduction to clear the secondary then back to full potential as the other primary is reduced. Part G must reflect this otherwise your output will suffer drastically. If you are not getting an output or a rather low output do not rant this device does not work because the reason it doesn't work is because of “YOU” not the device so figure out the problem and fix it. Figuera had a working model when presented to the patent office and powered his house and street lights in front of his house in Barcelona Spain so please do not tell me this device does not work.
Regards,
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 25, 2019 14:07:04 GMT -6
This graph shows the secondary output in relation to the positive brush location according to the amount of Inducive Reactance at both sides of the brush. in graph 1 set N is high with little to no Inductive Reactance while set S is at maximum Inductance. graph 2 part G and the primaries are even in Inductance with set S in the process of shoving set N out the core. graph 3 set S is high with little to no inductance while set N is at maximum inductance. graph 4 set S and Set N along with part G are even in inductance while set N is in the process of shoving set S out of the core.  
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 25, 2019 18:47:24 GMT -6
With coils, solenoids and inductors any time you increase the current flow there will be a voltage drop across the device as it is storing into the magnetic field as per the current flow. when the current is reduced that reduced potential is released into the system increasing the voltage in the system. this is with everything including the Figuera device and why he used an active Inductor to control current flow of the two feeds. the active Inductor is conserving the potential in the exciting system instead of burning it off like a heat death resistor. no potential in the exciting system waste power at any time plus the added benefit of controlling current flow with Inductive Reactance as per the previous post as the brush rotates. below is the added benefits of reducing coils, part G core and on the other side of part G the increase of the coils and part G. the whole system is all about the conservation of the exciting potential and the reason it can be a self runner. that and the fact that the two primaries do not link to each other or the secondary like in a Transformer. the Figuera device is all about conserving the exciting potential of the system that utilise all such reductions in the system in the reducing side to off set the potential drop of the rising side. nothing is ever wasted in the Figuera device.  
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 26, 2019 13:38:52 GMT -6
In the Figuera Electrical Generator there are no mechanical losses; friction losses; very little brush loss; windage losses; armature reaction losses; or air gap losses, because there is not any movement of any kind just the massless weightless field. There are eddy current, heat and hysteresis losses, which are inherent to the design, construction and the materials of the generator secondary output, but in the same extent as in common generators.
A few percent of the total energy produced by present electric generators goes to create their own magnetic field; a mechanical energy that exceeds the total output of present generators is used to make them rotate in the process of extracting electrical currents from them. In the Figuera Generator there is no need for movement since the field is in fact already rotating electro-magnetically as the primaries sweep back and forth, so all that mechanical energy will not be needed. Under similar conditions of exciting currents, core mass and winding's design, the Figuera Generator is significantly more efficient than present generators, which also means that it can produce significantly more than the energy it needs to operate. The Figuera Generator can feedback the system from a small secondary feed back, the temporary source may be disconnected and the Generator will run indefinitely.
As with any other generator, the FIguera Generator may excite its own electromagnetic field with a minimum part of the electrical energy produced. The Generator only needs to be started up by connecting Part G's inductance winding's to a external source for a short moment, and then to be disconnected, to start the system as described herein. Then, disconnected, it will run indefinitely generating a great excess of electric power to the extent of its design being a self runner.
The Figuera Generator can be designed and calculated with all mathematical formulas in use today to design and calculate electrical generators and motors. It complies with all of the laws and parameters used to calculate electrical induction and generation of electricity today. thus the exception would be the primaries as they are specifically wound as electromagnets to produce the strongest magnetic field possible and the use of thick wire on part G as it becomes the power supply.
Except for the Law of Conservation of Energy, which, by itself, is not a mathematical equation but a theoretical concept and by the same reason does not have any role in the mathematical calculation of an electrical generator of any type, the Figuera Generator complies with all the Laws of Physics and Electrical Engineering. it is quite obvious the Figuera Generator obligates us to review the Law of Conservation of Energy. In my personal belief, the electricity has never come from the mechanical energy that we put into a machine to move the masses against all oppositions. The mechanical system is actually providing the path for the condensation of electricity. The Figuera Generator provides a more efficient path for the electricity moving the weightless massless field not a huge chunk of iron.
The Figuera Generator is and will be a very simple machine. The keystones of the systems reside in the ultra-low losses of a non-movement generation system with the total lack of reverse torque from a spinning hunk of rotor Iron. balancing of the magnetic fields is most crucial.
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 26, 2019 13:41:46 GMT -6
I was asked just in an email today how in the world can the primaries exert motion into a secondary when both are stationary. ?
the primary electromagnets cause the E fields but it is the relative motion of the primaries being reduced and increased with the opposing secondary fields between them that induces currant flow into the secondary and the load. once the polarization takes place and currant begins to flow the primaries and the secondaries part ways and it is the rising primaries becomes the motive force that exerts motion into the secondary provided the circuit is closed with resistance of it's own. ( ie a load)
So lets stop and think about that for a minute. the compression of the two opposing electromagnetic fields dictate the intensity of the electric field as per the secondary output and as one is reduced and the other is increased. now the only time power from the primaries (inducers) are transferred to the secondaries (induced) is when the secondaries are to be polarized. once this polarization takes place and currant begins to flow in the secondary and the load the Lenz law comes into play and an opposing field to the first is formed around the secondary.
since this opposing field will be in between the opposing field of the primaries it is the relative motion of the primaries being reduced and increased that pushes that opposing secondary field across the Electric field formed by the reducing primaries. this will cause the secondaries to appear to have motion in them to the Electric field thus induces motion into the secondaries and currant will flow.
once this process takes place the primaries and the secondaries part ways and it is the relative motion of the rising primaries that exert motion into the secondaries provided the circuit is closed with resistance of it's own. after they part ways each system is essentially completely separate and no other time is power transferred to the secondary system. the power requirements of the induced (primaries) is reduced to that of just the IR2 losses and the replacement of the currant in the process of reducing the primaries to get motion into the secondaries back to full potential. the main key to this device is that the primaries do not magnetically link to each other nor do they link to the secondary directly.
the power used to sweep the opposing secondary field by the rising primaries ( Weightless Massless Field) across the Electric field formed by the reducing primaries is so ridiculously small that the unit can power it's self and the load once it is started.
part G in the patent is basically a dynamic inductor that increases or decreases the currant through the primary N and S sets that exert motion into the secondaries.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 26, 2019 14:53:53 GMT -6
Any time you people have Questions please feel free to message me by clicking on my forum name or post in general discussion thread. i will answer as soon as i can.
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 27, 2019 10:11:55 GMT -6
In the FIguera device patent the picture below is what Figuera describes as " the commutator bars or contacts of a ring distributor or cylinder whose contacts are in communication with a resistance whose value varies from a maximum to a minimum and vice versa" what he is actually describing is the actual brush travel in a circular motion and thus calls it a Commutator bars, ring distributor or cylinder. think about this for a moment, the brush is traveling in a ring as in a circle which resistance varies from high to low. if you notice he NEVER states specifically what the actual device is, giving not one but three examples for which to chose from in his description. it is my firm belief that the actual device is in fact thick wires looped around the core and the brush travels in a ring or circle fashion for which makes contact varying the resistance from high to low. as i have previously stated in prior posts the commutator bars do not exist as does the "R". Part G was made in Germany from either two sources that were capable of doing precision work, one was Otto and the other was Zeiss. the original replicator that did share some good information to me also thinks that the device was made by Zeiss and through my research i wholly agree. Abby that was the Chief engineer with Zeiss had developed an adjustable variac to control his high intensity light source for his microscopes which employed the use of an E. I. core with a fat center leg. the timing of this tech and being in Germany is just to profound not to highly consider. any winding's on a closed core specifically focusing all attention to the ring of travel of the brush then using this throughout the patent in the description in it's elementary form with picture that support this description can easily be done. "R" shown in the patent pic does not exist as stated before as the Inductive Reactance (Resistance) is the actually wires on the core that magnetically link to each other causing the actual resistance in the device. another fact to consider is the fact that Abby of Zeiss employed the use of a roller brush on his E.I. cores. if you look at the drawing below this is an exact replication of a roller brush that travels in a ring like fashion. the added pic is the actual type of roller brush employed by Zeiss and the Figuera device. there is no reason someone can not use regular brushes in the Figuera device as i am just stating facts of the original device. the uses of this type of brush would easily handle the high speed rotation required of the Figuera device and not lift off the wire since it is just rotating in a ring or circular fashion. the two people that followed my advice on this above description was Hannon for which i told him how to do it with a variac using DC and the second one was creasysee for which he has both videos on his web site that shown just how Inductive reactance using DC can be employed to control current flow of two separate feeds and one active Inductor.  
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 27, 2019 12:00:16 GMT -6
In order to maintain the pressure between the two opposing electromagnets one must never reduce the reducing primaries below half way or induction will fail. the whole idea in this device primary is to just clear the secondary then back to full potential as the other primary is reduced. this action will enable the primaries to maintain the required pressure between them at all times. the higher the flux potential is maintained the more the output so if one was to drop the pressure to far induction will most definitely fail. one of the main keys to a good output is to just reduce the primary to clear the secondary then back to full potential. if the reducing primary is swept over to far there will be a double spike on the output where it drops in potential then spikes again as the opposing secondary field is taken to far. in the graph below the calculations for part G are added. part G is calculated to just get the required sweep of the primaries and nothing more. if part G has not enough Induction the sweep in the secondary will in fact be to small thus the output will be substantially reduced. with a small sweep there will be a small electric field created and the output will suffer. if part G has to much inductance the sweep will be to far and the double spike will appear reducing the output again. there needs to be an orderly rise and fall of current flow at all times so any interuption of said current flow will cause a spike of Bemf and the device will no longer function as intended. this will not be noticeable in the bulb test but in the real device it is detrimental to it's operation. remember the opposing primaries are compressing the magnetic flux to match the high intensity field of a standard generators north and south field. if you fail to maintain this flux compression you will fail to get an output. below graph is just to get a general idea of the reduction process and the required induction of your build and will vary according to ratio of primary to secondary, material used, winding count ect. 
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 27, 2019 14:01:20 GMT -6
The field is strong when the lines are close together, and it is weak when the field lines move apart from each other. The number of field lines is directly proportional to the magnitude of the charge. So with these two Physics examples taken directly off of a physics site you can clearly see that the more compression of the field lines will produce a higher output and the magnitude of the charge or electric field is substantially increased. this is the sole purpose of the opposing electromagnets in the Figuera device to compress the field lines to match that of a standard generator. you are only reducing the electromagnet to produce an electric field and to get the sweeping action fore which the increasing electromagnet to induce motion into the secondary and to maintain the field line pressures of the reducing electromagnet. see the attached picture which depicts the correct sweep of the primaries. any more or less and the output will suffer. it has been shown by builders in testing that when N the secondary opposing field is taken over to far in your sweep you will get a second spike in your output which is not good. it is to just clear the reducing electromagnet then swept to the other side. MM 
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 28, 2019 11:37:53 GMT -6
*In light of some startling information i have recently come across i will post what i have learned.*
One of my past fellow builders had more money then i at the time and was a in the testing stage of his device which i might add followed my research. what he realized was there was an 90 degree phase shift from the electromagnets with respects to the Part G's brush and the secondaries has a 90 degree phase shift with a resistive load.
when reviewing some of my old notes from the original replicator plus my own research i realized some very important aspects contained in the information i gathered. it is stated that a 20 kw motor was attached to the system as was the lights in his home and the front house street lights. what is clearly NOT stated is the fact that the motor was never stated as actually being connected to anything except the system it's self. the point i am getting to is that since there is some phase shifts taking place the mere fact that a single phase motor will have capacitor within the motor to aide in it's self starting and running rotation that will off set the phase difference of the previously stated.
it is my sole opinion from all my years of research with this new information found that the 20 kw motor was solely placed in the system for timing alignment. the mere fact that a resistive load phase shifts 90 degrees out will cause severe timing issues causing the output to drop drastically. yet with this single phase motor that has capacitors within the motor will entirely off set this 90 degree resistive phase shift and the output will remain at full potential. these phase shifts are facts gathered by myself and other builders.
so whether the motor was connected to a load or not, it offset the resistive phase shift and the primary electromagnets phase shift allowing the timing to remain coherent thus the output remains at full potential at all times. the input of the secondary feed back can also be adjusted to compensate or offset for any other slight phase shifts occurring.
do the studies, do the math, do the research and one will find this post has substantial merit with facts presented.
MM
|
|