1908 Mechanical/Electronic tech info

In the Figuera device he chose his opposing electromagnets to avoid direct linking to each other and to the secondary. This makes it much easier to not only compress the field lines but to sweep the fields back and fourth over the space occupied by the secondary. Each electromagnets is occupying the secondary one at a time all while maintaining field line pressures. Even though the electromagnets magnetic flux fields are the same when placed side by side, when placed end to end their flux is now at different direction opposite to the other. In order to get the induced in alignment one has to be raised and the other reduced which align their electric fields.


This is no different then that of a standard generator that moves through a north south field then a south north field. the same conditions are still being met with the FIguera device with flux reversal, the only difference is one is stationary that uses opposing fields to avoid linking into one field and to each other. All conditions of EMF production are being met and at no time is any such silly laws of conservation being broken which in reality do not even pertain to an motional electric fields in the first place. a transformer yes, a motional electric field NO.

Motional Electric Fields can NOT be shielded like gravity and do not abide by the conservation laws and was even stated by Maxwell in his original quatrains that more energy can be had from a system then put in. This is what scared the hell out of J. P. Morgan and why he spent Millions hiding this fact.





MM

If one loop to many on one half of part G can cause an imbalance. if one primary is slightly stronger then the other a nonmagnetic shim or another coat of resin on the end may be just what it takes for balance. Just be aware of the possible issues that may arise in the balancing of this device. a multi channel scope will detect such imbalances and alert you of impeding issues.

MM

As we can see from this video from a member from three years ago that asked me personally how to test the validity of part G. I told him exactly what to use and how to hook it up to test the Inductive Reactance of a moving DC brush. This member then after this video denied i helped him attempting to take all the praise which was a complete lie as he was an pharmacist not a builder of any kind that is why this person failed at every thing he attempted to build there after. [a href="link"]link to video[/a] these vary facts can be verified on old EF posts.

EDIT; Funny EF deleted the post link, Imagine that. Arron is money whore selling trinkets and books off the back of other people and has no intention of producing free energy what so ever. He clung on to Eric Dollard which is a shame Eric doesn't realize it.

This video shows just why "R" the so called resistance in the patent and the commutator bars are not actually part of the system. Part G gets it's resistance from the CEMF or the magnetic flux linking as the brush rotates making contact with the actual wire looped around the core not some hunk of commutator bar metal embedded then connected with thin wires. This information along with what i have been posting along with Creasysee's video completely destroys the commutator/ "R" theories people seem to dream up from the patent drawing. "R" was draw in it's elementary form to facilitate the comprehension of the entire system. and to fixed ideas convenient to refer to the attached drawing which is no more then a sketch to understand the operation of the machine built using the principals outlined.
Each time the knob is rotated inductive reactance is present and stops when the movement of the knob stops. inductive rectance ceases and full current flows in both bulbs.

Part G is an active Inductor Controller built by Zeiss with a roller brush that rotates in a circular ring type fashion which is Figuera's entire focus of attention on not the rest of the core. As the brush rotates it makes contact with more then one loop contacts at a time to minimize sparking and to achieve a linear rise and fall of current flow in two separate banks of electromagnets in complete unison. The bars are the actual wire wound on Part G's core not some fairy land embedded bars.

Marathonman

I am having a hard time trying to draw real graphs of what is taking place in the primary and secondary cores. Since i have no graphic experience i am forced to use paint in windows.
Please excuse the poor graphs but i hope it gets the point across.

When the reducing electromagnet is being reduced it is also creating an electric field at the same time with the opposing secondary field with the rising primary to shove the reducing out of the core. When the opposing field of the secondary (Lenz Law Field) is swept across this electric field it sees the secondary as moving and as such creates a motional EMF in the secondary. The electric field care less how the secondary has motion Just the fact that it does have motion. it sees this opposing field of the secondary move across the electric field so to it there is motion. When i say the rising primary induces motion into the secondary this is what i am talking about.

It literally shoves the secondary opposing field to the other side of the secondary then the newly rising primary does the exact same thing shoving the whole group to the other side which will change polarity each time. The shovee, is the reducing electromagnet which is the creator of the electric field, the shover, is the rising electromagnet that does the shoving of the opposing fields to one side of the secondary.
Below is the electric field created by the reducing electromagnet which starts as soon as the electromagnet starts reducing from that point to the edge of the secondary as it is shoved out of the core. this is a complete sweep of the secondary.

MM

More supportive information on part G inductive controller.


  When the current through an Inductor is increased, it drops a voltage opposing the direction of electron flow, acting as a power load. In this condition, the Inductor is said to be charging, because there is an increasing amount of energy being stored in its magnetic field. Note the polarity of the voltage with regard to the direction of current. When storing into the magnetic field there will be a voltage drop across that Inductor or coil as in an electromagnet. all coils store and release potential when the current changes.





Conversely, when the current through the Inductor is decreased, it drops a voltage aiding the direction of electron flow, acting as a power source. In this condition, the Inductor is said to be discharging, because its store of energy is decreasing as it releases energy from its magnetic field to the rest of the circuit. Note the polarity of the voltage with regard to the direction of current.




With Part G active Inductor Controller with a positive brush constantly changes the magnetic flux to current ratio (which is the opposition to current flow) as the winding's are added and subtracted to either side of the brush as it spins. Whether the two sides of the Inductor are storing into the field or releasing it's field into the system the current flows in the same direction at all times.

As with the above Increasing or decreasing  Inductor in which the electromagnets will be the same releasing or storing it's potential into part G we have two released potentials acting as power sources plus the secondary feed back and two sources acting as a load. So all three powers sources act together to Amplify the potential to the rising electromagnets up to it's peak to replace the reduced electromagnets field line pressure off setting the potential drop from Part G and the rising electromagnets storing into the magnetic field.

REVIEW:

• The ability of an inductor to store energy in the form of a magnetic field (and consequently to oppose changes in current) is called inductance. It is measured in the unit of the Henry (H).

So basically one half of the Figuera device (Reducing) feeds the other half (Increasing) all while preserving the potential of the exciting side of the system, giving rise to Amplification and controlling current flow of two feeds all within Part G.

MM

 Fundamental Basics.

  What are the fundamental bases fore which to increase the magnetic fields in your electromagnets. More turns, higher current, better material, length of coil are the examples given in present day teachings which are wholly incomplete.

To start, the use of more turns to increase the magnetic flux for your core is one of the fundamental examples. The more turns increases the flux substantially but can have adverse effects taken to far as the increased length of wire increases the IR2 losses, self induction and heat losses. This fact is substantially increase the smaller the wire diameter is which produces more losses in which are the complete opposite of our goal of efficient electromagnets. In what book, what university or whom specifically stated told you that the wire had to be one length of wire is completely beyond me. No where does it state as fact that the wire has to be one length of wire to attain strong magnetic fields, it just states more turns.

Using higher current to excite your electromagnet in the Figuera device cost much, much more in the long run. If the fundamental nature of part G is to conserve the potential in the exciting side of the system then will some one please explain to me why someone would plow their electromagnets with 10 amp of current knowing full well that the potential has to come from somewhere in which part G was not designed to induce such current. Part G was designed to conserve potential thus expelling ONLY what it needs to achieve this goal so other means have to be deployed to increase the magnetic fields of the primary electromagnets. (current increase is NOT the way to go.)

The use of better material can have a substantial effects on increasing your magnetic fields of your electromagnets. The advent of lamination's has a remarkable effects of your field produced, reducing not only Hysteresis, eddy currents, and heat losses which increases the output substantially in your secondaries. By splitting the core up in lamination's reduces the circulation of eddy currents which oppose the magnetic field produced.

So if lamination's, the layering of the core can increase the output then why can't the primary winding be layered or to split up the winding's in groups of smaller length wire to achieve the exact same thing as above statements on length of wire as one. This technique of subdivision of the wire length substantially reduces the losses associated with a one wire length coil. Thus can achieve the end results of a highly efficient electromagnets as used in the Figuera device with very little losses associated with it.

And last but not least is the use of the entire core length.  This is probably the second most important issue or decision one can make when constructing your electromagnets. It doesn't matter is you use a thousand winds on your core if the coil it's self is only an inch wide on a three inch core. It will be literally impossible to get all the magnetic domains to switch to one direction outside of the coil with this type of deployment let alone achieve a three inch field from the end of the core. The best way to achieve a substantial magnetic field is to utilize the entire core with your coil that way all the domains are likely to line up in one direction.

To recap the intention of these last posts is to bring one's awareness of different winding techniques employed that can be utilized in the Figuera device primaries.  The use of just one length of wire is not spoken, written in stone or as an absolute fact anywhere on this planet. One must use research, testing and sound judgement when when winding your coils to achieve your goal of the most efficient electromagnet as possible. The use of one wire length is HIGHLY NOT RECOMMENDED in your primaries.

REMEMBER always, that Part G controls the current flow through your electromagnets no mater if they have ZERO ohms or has 50 ohms, it still controls the current flow at all times. Zero ohms or close there of just means that you have created the most efficient electromagnet as possible which will respond to the slightest current change from part G in complete unison with no delay.

Regards,
Marathonman

The reason for this is balance of the magnetic fields is a must in this system as any imbalance will result in one electromagnet either peaking to much or shoving to far to one side or the other resulting in a substantial reduction in your output. The primaries are to just clear the secondary when reduced then back to full potential as the other is reduced. Part G is also part of this equation as it to must be wound correctly as each half from center out must match each other. Any imbalance in part G will show up in the primaries then if you already have an imbalance in your primaries this will be compounded leading to a royal pain to balance.

As an example of the primary output of say 1 kilowatt output of one triplet set (two primaries one secondary) the secondary must first be able to handle the magnetic flux in the core without overheating with some headroom. The pressure required for that output is 14.8 lbs per square inch per kilowatt and this of course can be split up to as many secondary/primary sets as you want to work with. The primaries are then required to handle 1/2 of that pressure each so each primary electromagnet is accountable for 7.4 lbs each. They must be able to do so with the current provided as that current is split up between the two electromagnets.

The primaries being in repulsion will maintain the 14.8 lbs pressure even though one is reduced to get the sweeping action across the secondary. At every spot between the secondary the pressure from the primaries will add up to 14.8 lbs. This is achieved by the reducing side of the system off setting the potential drop of the rising side and the secondary feed back into part G to forward bias the rising primary. This will cause a voltage increase which causes a current increase to the primaries which offset the reducing primary reduction in pressure to get the sweeping action. This forward biasing starts the second the reducing primary starts to rise with the reducing primary releasing it's stored potential and increases until the rising primary peaks. Rhis is the amplification factor most are overlooking.

There are basically four actions performed simultaneously by each electromagnet either reducing or increasing at the same time.

Reducing electromagnet.

1. Opposing pressure increases field line pressure to that of a standard generator. Both primaries are accountable for this output pressure.

2. Reducing to get sweeping action and to remove it's flux from the secondary.

3. Creates the electric field the secondary opposing field is swept across.

4. Reduced potential released to feed the rising side of the system.

Increasing Electromagnet

1. Opposing pressure increases field line pressure to that of a standard generator. both primaries are accountable for this output pressure.

2. Increases to shove the reducing electromagnets flux out of the core and to sweep the opposing secondary field to the other side.

3. Fills the secondary with it's opposite magnetic flux.

4. Stores flux in the form of a magnetic field only to be released in the next reducing cycle.



regards,
Marathonman