|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 9:36:56 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 10 January 2018
This is my earlier work and i have learned much, much more since these publications please to NOT take these to total heart as i did make some slight mistakes in my earlier research. the new posting in the other threads are completely correct as will this one and should be followed to the letter.
EDIT; "i have completed my minor mistakes corrections so the rest of the post are good to go.
I also would like to point out that the banksters really did not touch the patent as such because Figuera wrote a slightly cryptic patent so i guess they left it a lone. most people can't even get past part G because they are associating the pic to the device when in reality the pic is just part G in it's very, very basic form just for understanding purposes and one needs to think out side of the box and of that time period.
there are basically only two ways to control currant, one is through resistance which is very, very wasteful and the other is through a magnetic field. a lost art that was used at the turn of the century using a magnetic field to control currant flow. what Figuera did was split the feed into two and controlled both separately using an inductor and a rotating brush. as the positive brush rotated the currant running through the primaries to part G caused a north magnetic fields at the brush from both feeds. having two north faced opposing fields allowed them to stay completely separate while varying the currant of both in complete unison dynamically. as the brush rotated the amount of winding's changed magnetically linking to the system thus varying the amount of magnetic field opposing the original currant flow.
and this my new friends is how Figuera did it.
Most of the posts were deliberately deleted by ME from Hyiq as i wanted absolutely nothing to do with that arse hole Chris dictator. so these are what was left and Creasysee had copied here.
Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 9:38:31 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 10 January 2018
In a standard Generator we have almost the same thing happening as in the Figuera device except of course the Figuera device main section that does the generating does not move. in a standard geny part of the output is used to excite and create a magnetic field then the rotor rotates through these fields creating currant. the amount of power used to excite this field is ONLY a few percent of the output so why in hell can't a geny be overunity. well it has to do with the cogging effect, as the rotor passes the stator polls it tends to not want to let go. the attraction is so intense that it takes massive power to overcome this attractive force and destroys any chance of being OU. using 150 % power to get 90 % power is not only crazy but only benefits the rich oil barrons and rapes the environment
Figuera on the other hand figured out that he could do the same thing by just moving the weightless, massless field back and fourth totally eliminating the cogging effect entirely.
did you hear what i said (THE WEIGHTLESS, MASSLESS FIELD) that takes a minute amount of power to move back and fourth thus rendering those smog farting, environment and people killing machines OBSOLETE.
Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 9:50:18 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 10 January 2018
I really don't look at it quite like that. i don't see charge separation, negative or positive anywhere in our universe. what i see is pressure gradients of highs and lows pulsing in and out, reaction and reaction in a wave type motion.
in my mind electricity is pressures of high and low not positive and negative so the Figuera device is a pressure pump. as pressure always tries to equalize the Figuera device keeps the pressure out of balance seeking equilibrium and is in a constant state of. or as another view in a constant state of charge and discharge.
the Tesla AC to DC patent is such a device that allows the pressure to travel only one way being blocked by a magnetic field the other direction.
Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 9:51:01 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 11 January 2018
Every atom collects it's energy from the Zero point energy field NOT from mater. mater has no energy it self other than what is supplied from the energy field. it does not exist until in our 3D realm until it is brought into from that said field. and i believe EVERY word from Nicola Tesla as he WAS THE MASTER. i may not understand it all but i have a fairly good grasp on things. we as all mater that is living has a common connection and thus are naturally connected through the energy grid that functions as a two way highway of information and energy connected through God.
yes i believe the Anunnaki created us as the information and evidence is way to over whelming to not consider. we have been lied to for 6,000 years and those bastards are still trying to lie to us. we were created as slaves but i refuse to be a slave any longer, that is why i need to get the Figuera device out there to the people who deserve it.
i am a man of my word and live by my word and you people will get the information in my head if it kills me or they kill me first.
Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 9:53:59 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 11 January 2018
yes i can. start with no less than two sets.
use MOTS to start (microwave oven cores) all the same size and weight.
any dimension will do as long as the secondary is 1/2 than the primaries.
wire size is up to the builder but output is recommended to be same or larger.
start small for replication.
Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 9:56:06 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 11 January 2018
So lets sum up the information that is presented so far on the Figuera device through my research and what was shared to me.
------------PRIMARIES------------
1. primaries need to have low resistance as fast response time in essential.can parallel or series to get desired effects.
2. lowest ohms as possible since part G controls the currant and we need the highest magnetic field possible within the limits of the core material. can be series or paralleled but preferable lowest ohm's possible. use of thick wire is recommended for lowest ohms possible and the use of thick foil is most optimal. wind as electromagnets with highest magnetism not according to known winding tech. part G controls the currant not the primaries.
3. the coil winding's need to span almost the entire length of the core not leaving huge gaps.
4. the primaries have to be larger than the secondaries and at no time smaller. remembering square of the distance.
5. primaries need to be separate from the secondaries as eddy currants will interfere with the primaries main function and create losses and heat.
6. be butted up next to secondaries with as little as gap as possible, use resin on ends.
7. be properly secured as massive pressures will make parts fly at extreme velocities with possible risk of injury.
8. use of N/N primaries opposing fields to attain double strength E field as N/S.
9. Winding will be announced after complete running device and self sustaining.
10. Not wound according to present winding techniques. wound specifically to be electromagnets as part G controls currant flow.
----------SECONDARIES----------
1. core thickness to match primary.
2. wound with thicker wire according to load requirements with headroom.
3. winding span almost entire length of core not leaving huge gaps.
4. can be series and or paralleled to attain voltage and currant requirements.
5. use of secondary to power it self to replace losses in part G from wire, heat and core losses.
6. wound according to present day techniques.
----------Part G------------
1. Core va rating must exceed load rating (Each half calculated Separately) plus additional head room steering clear of saturation. if saturation occur device will cease functioning.
2. be wound with thicker wire than primaries remembering that the wire rating is the sum of lower smaller branches plus headroom. since patent says (commutator bars ) i would suggest square wire as it is easiest to get a flat face but harder to work with.
3. use a closed core system, ie. toroid or C type core (most efficient) as feedback from primaries is of great importance mirroring primaries opposing function and proper magnetic field rotation. EI core can be used but with slightly lower performance. straight core is not recommended as flux field can not be retained nor rotated.
4. secure wire to core as relative high rotational speeds will be attained if using standard rotating part G. transistor driven does not.
5. use high quality brushes as wear longevity is essential for standard rotating part G.
6. brush rotation of part G causes dynamic induction allowing currant manipulation through magnetic core saturation/inductance/impedance change. rotation of brush magnetically links windings to circuit causing additional self inductance.
7. be wound CW starting from Set S output to set N output. this will give N><N at the brush.
------------TIMING-------------
1. timing is very crucial in the Figuera device, primaries are to be kept in complete unison at all times,
2. timing of primaries are 180 degrees from each other, as one is rising the other is falling but allowing the primaries an secondaries to remain in phase.
3. at no time is the primaries reduced to below half way and NEVER ZERO as induction will be lost from the reducing electromagnet falling to the output of the rising electromagnet reducing the output to less than 1/4 of original output. suggested 1/3 to 1/2 depending on core geometry.
4. collision wall of opposing electromagnets has to just clear secondary to attain proper B x V Motional field function as does maintaining complete unison all while retaining 80 to 90 % of original field strength.
----------DEVICE----------
1. this device is DC operated. ac will not work in this device as reversing polarities will cause the destruction of the Motional Electric Fields as well as all inductive feed back ect. also the magnetic fields take to long to build up with AC.
Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 9:59:07 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 11 January 2018 Like i said that miss information will only serve to confuse people and new comers. that paper was assumed by someone and found to be incorrect. besides the fact that the drawing is there for comprehension ONLY and IS NOT THE REAL DEVICE as stated in the patent. i repeat the pic is NOT THE REAL DEVICE. and i hope your understanding is not based on that pic. Marathonman  |
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 10:01:21 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 11 January 2018 - Last edited 11 January 2018
The machine took full advantage of electromagnetic induction because it was lined up core to core at all time not separating like rotating ones.
the reason the device put out more than it took to run it was due to the fact that it had no moving parts and only moved the massless weightless field plus sentence one.
induction is just induction according to Faraday's laws of induction. a regular generator would do the same if it wasn't for the massive cogging effect. both type only take a small percent to excite.
Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 10:02:34 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 12 January 2018
If you want to get nitty gritty Buforn's patents are null and void. you can not patent a patent and thus renders them useless. they made a mistake at the patent office which was in Barcelona Spain by issuing them to him. even though his patents are the same as Figuera's he spilled the beans a little more than Figuera did as we all know from the 1908 patent is really cryptic and exposed only enough info to just get the patent.
the 20 year patent ran out in 1928 and was buried in the patent office until it was found about 8 years ago and has been in the public domain ever since thus any replication there of CAN NOT BE PATENT as any and all in the public domain can not be patent.
i expose this info for all to see and build so those sorry Banksters can go to H#LL.
Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 10:03:48 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 12 January 2018
One thing is very useful when testing your primaries is the use of a high powered resistor. see the primaries are wound to get the most bang for the buck with low resistance not according to present day winding techniques where resistance controls the currant. since the are specifically wound as electromagnets because part G controls the currant flow, that tends to freak out power supplies when testingso a few high power resistors connected in series helps. checking the resistance on an adjustable resistor set to 100 ohms with the primary connected will will give you 1 amp @ 100 volts and this is what Figuera used.
i have two 300 watt adjustable resistors and they come in real handy at a purchase price of 24 dollars each.
using a little more currant will not hurt a thing as long as you don't go crazy.
Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 10:06:45 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 12 January 2018 we will see if it works. yahoo,,, thanks Zanzal. below is a pic of the finished primaries and secondaries on a core of iron. these cores and coils were stolen by a stupid ex room mate that let a drug addict stay alone in the house. she stole $2,100 worth of my things.  Marathonman |
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 10:21:08 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 12 January 2018 Here is a pic of the building of the bobbins. the cloth is eco-Fi craft felt made from recycled plastic bottles.  Marathonman |
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 10:23:17 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 12 January 2018 Here they are curing in front of the fire place.  Marathonman |
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 10:25:44 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 12 January 2018 And finally here is a pic of painted finished bobbins.  Marathonman |
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 10:26:54 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 13 January 2018 a pic of my winder and the winding tree as i call it made from water pipe from Lows. Thank you all for the kind comments.  Marathonman |
|
