|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:13:26 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 17 January 2018
Thank you,
I really am glad you understand the point i was trying to convey. i have other videos in the making. i have decided to replace video 1 as it was just a gripe video of Energetic pitfalls. anyways it will be an overall operation of the device. video 2 is what you watched explaining why electromagnets are all north face. video 3 will be on the operation of the primaries and the secondaries and video 4 will be on part G exclusively.
again thanks and i hope you enjoy the series.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:14:07 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 17 January 2018
That would possibly be true if it was AC but in this device we are using DC so not a phase difference. just in relation to the secondary the raising and lowering of the currant. while one is rising the other is falling or rather reducing.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:14:45 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 17 January 2018
I don't know where i got this from maybe Walter Russel might have said It i don't remember but what it said is the Magnetic Field itself that creates drag; it creates Friction on Electric Charge itself. It can be seen as heat in Conventional Electric Generators. ie. Lenz Law. this would tend to be very true especially in an inductor's point of view. a changing magnetic field creates drag on currant flow thus reducing it for a period of time and when the field equalizes full currant flow is restored. the reduction period in the part G has been extended on a dynamic basis adding or subtracting winds as the brush rotates thus the two fields are either increasing or decreasing and never equalize.
This very fact must be true as Walter Russel's device had almost no magnetic properties at all and was based on the amplification factor similar to a tornado amplifying voltage and currant.
Interestingly, the World’s most efficient Generators are 98–99% efficient; this means that 100% of Rotational Shaft Energy, with a 1-2% loss in friction/heating and other losses, and the other 98–99 % are the effects of Lenz Law creating Magnetic Drag on the moving Rotor to generate Electrical Energy.
in the Figuera device the 98 to 99 % rotational drag has been eliminated all together.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:21:48 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 22 January 2018
First off that video you posted has many flaws and one of them is about a rheostat. i am sorry but part G is not in any way shape or form a rheostat as any and i mean ALL resistors waste energy in the form of heat and in this case would heat your house up. Figuera as a really smart physics professor would of course use the most efficient method he could in his device aside from the fact that the patent specifically says the drawing is just to understand it;s operation and is in no way the real device. so why in heck are people so darn determined to treat it as such is beyond me. i am still laughing at this guys sad interpretation of the Figuera device thus obviously knows nothing of the sort with a complete lack of reasoning skills that totally miss the tech of that time period. plus the graph was ripped off from my Energetic forum thread and used in that video.
secondly your theories of generators is completely flawed. i am sorry fellas this device IS NOT A TRANSFORMER in any way shape or form and you will never get anywhere if you continue to treat is as a transformer.
Yes the secondary will still exhibit and follow the lenz law as that is unavoidable but you are overlooking the fact that the field interaction is taking place outside of the primaries in the space occupied by the secondary and again the figuera device is not a transformer and you need to get that association out of your head if you are to understand this device at all and that goes for EVERYONE.
the primaries cause the initial induction in the secondary but as the currant starts to flow in the secondary and load it created a second field opposite to the first ie... lenz law. is it this field that is shoved from side to side in the secondary from the primaries. the way i understand it that once the secondary creates this second field inside of the secondary, the primary fields can easily move this field from side to side with ease with basically almost zero effort as long as the load is present.
Quote from original replicator;
this analogy is similar to that of a squirrel cage motor, there is no current or voltage going into the rotor. It develops it's own current through induction and establishes it's own magnetic field only as a result of the relative motion between the rotating field and the core. If the core catches up to the rotating field the relative motion is reduced and the current in the rotor reduces slowing down the rotor until the relative motion is fast enough to induce a stronger field in the rotor so it can be pushed around by the rotating field again. They don't combine into mutual fields as that would stop the relative motion. Without having a rotating rotor like the squirrel cage motor to provide the difference between the rotating field and the induced field on the rotor it takes a bit of creative thinking to accomplish the same effect in a stationary condition of the cores in Clemente's generator. Maybe that will resonate with your classical training. There is no electrical connection from primary to secondary and after induction in the secondary from the primary's, it produces current around the secondary (Y) which creates another field inside Y they part company and the primaries become the motive force that exerts motion onto Y provided Y is a closed circuit with resistance of it's own. motion across the circular E field in an N>N<N field with the secondary field in between the primaries.
I hope this helps.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:23:04 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 23 January 2018
Yes, ill agree to the last only for the sake of the readers but in reality there is high pressure on one side and low pressure on the other.
additionally the Figuera device has an output that matches the standard generators north ab south high intensity fields from field line compression.
a transformer transforms currant and voltage either up or down with the potential being the same with both minus losses.
a generator generates potential that is not proportional to it's input thus being a lot higher than what was put in. your average generator only requires a small percentage of it's output to excite it's magnetic coils and this is something that can NEVER be achieved with a transformer. this is something that Ramswami dude in the PJK book found out the hard way of trying to make a transformer generate, it isn't going to happen.
the Motional Electric Field is in no way proportional to standard transformer induction thus achieving a much higher potential than that of induction. this is FACT NOT OBSERVATION. thus a geny would only transform not generate if this was not the case.
these very equations is what J.P.Morgan paid Heaviside and Lorentz to rid Maxwell and Faraday's equations of all traces of free energy thus what we have left is pure crap equations. Morgan paid Millions to hide these equations from the public eye changing every book he could get his hands on.
aside the fact that a lot of our so called fundamental Law's of Physics are flawed from the start including gravity that does not exist. just like the fact that everything gives off a magnetic field from the energy it collects from the surrounding environment yet our eyes and brain show a different picture of reality thus giving us a false sense of observation and incorrect assumptions of Physics and reality as a whole.
sure the apple fell from the tree, that does not mean that gravity exists, just that our observation of what our eyes and brain told us it happened.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:23:44 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 24 January 2018
Since i started this journey i have had a ton of people disagree with my findings so it is nothing unusual. most of the defiance is because of the lack of understanding or the total mind set of dogma classical training. in most cases the confusion are of spin direction or the fact that we have one electromagnet coming in (increasing) and one going out (decreasing) thus changes the spin or rather the E field direction and NOT the original magnetic field which does not change. just because you are pulling a magnet away from a coil does not change the fact that the magnetic field is always in one direction, opposing.
as the secondary, with a load attached begins currant flow, the secondary will produce a opposing field according to the lenz law. it is this field that is sandwiched between the primaries and is swept across the E field that produces the output. it is just the relative motion of the primaries that causes this effect.
if the primaries are taken down to far in strength it will take to long for the magnetic field to build up and induction will drop to the rising electromagnet thus the output will fall considerably. this is why AC can never be used in the Figuera device. once the fields are up to running conditions the currant will flow through the primaries as if it was a straight piece of wire because the fields are at maximum strength and can not store any more in it's field. when the currant is reduced through part G (the controller) the primaries are still retaining a very large portion of its magnetic field so little currant is used or lost after this reducing process. the reducing is not in relation to each other but in relation to the secondary. since we have two opposing fields the width or breadth of the opposing fields will be quite large so the currant reduction of the reducing electromagnet will be small (1/3 to 1/2) to just clear the secondary then rise as the other reduces in an orderly unison fashion.
since the electromagnets are NOT controlling the currant (PART G DOES THIS) they are to be wound specifically as electromagnets with very little resistance allowing them to fulfill their intended use. this again has everyone confused as most are use to winding them with resistance that controls currant flow and this would not be the case in the Figuera device as PART G controls the currant flow NOT the primaries. the primaries are not wound according to present day teachings because of the before mentioned fact. when testing primary electromagnets a high power resistor is handy to have as the low resistance of the primaries will freak out a power supply so additional resistance is helpful.
the secondaries on the other hand ARE wound according to present day teachings just as any standard generator would be.
since all the currant will be governed by part G and basically will be the power supply once the starting power is removed it is suggested to make sure the wire wound on part G not only has little ohms (resistance) but is large enough that it can handle the currant it is to supply the system plus headroom. part G stores and releases energy in the form of a magnetic field combines with the reducing electromagnets inductive kick into part G at that very moment causing an amplification to the rising electromagnet. this also store considerable power in a magnetic field to feed set S the next half rotation when set S is set to increase and set N is decreasing. the N-N field at the positive brush allows the inductance of the two inputs to be governed separately but in complete unison. the addition or subtraction of winding's as the brush rotates will cause them to magnetically link or unlink to the system thus the opposition to currant flow will rise and fall in an orderly fashion using self inductance (magnetic fields) to control currant flow at an efficiency that not a single resistor on this planet can touch. the addition of the secondary attached to the system is there to supply currant from losses and aides in the amplification process to the rising electromagnet.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:24:22 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 24 January 2018
As you can read there is a lot more to the Figuera device than just a couple of bucking coils and it took one hell of a genius to figure this out. it is quite obvious that Figuera was unbelievably gifted but hid his device from the public eyes probably knowing some day it would be found and the cat would be let out of the bag.
MEOW !
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:25:50 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 24 January 2018
Actually a very high percentage can't even get past the drawing even though it specifically say in the patent "FOR UNDERSTANDING OF THE FUNCTION" and is in no way the real working device.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:26:13 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 25 January 2018
B fields or rather magnetic field from a magnet or electromagnet do not magically change direction at any time thus the field is in one direction at ALL TIMES. this is how the pressure is maintained between the electromagnets when one is reduced, the field is not reversing just reducing. the pressure between them (magnetic fields) is what keeps them separate at all times
and again it would take to long for the magnetic fields to build up if the electromagnet was taken down to far or to zero thus induction would fall to the rising electromagnet thus breaking coherency between them. this is the very reason why AC can NOT be used in the Figuera device. the primaries are only reduced to just clear the secondary then back up reducing the other side to just clear the secondary thus allows the fields to retain 80 to 90% of their magnetic field maintaining coherency between them.
if you are still having trouble with that visualization picture a sheet of paper between two water glasses. if the pressure is maintained between the two the paper stays but if the pressure between then is not maintained the paper will fall from between them. now picture the glasses moving from side to side in an orderly fashion. if the pressure between them (magnetic field) is maintained the paper stays (induction from both) if the paper falls from between them from pressure to low (week magnetic field pressure) the paper (induction) will surely drop and drop it will to the rising electromagnet.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:28:25 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 25 January 2018  It's all about charge and discharge thus the spin direction is very important . Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:29:03 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 26 January 2018
All the info i have presented to this forum through my posts and graphs can be downloaded and studied at your home. reread the posts and study the graphs intensely and try to visualize what is happening in the parts as the device is in operation. i have provided the winding direction of part G the controller/regulator and the winding direction of the primaries so that and the other info i posted should be enough for people out there to test at their own home at your leisure. using microwave oven transformers is a very good option because they are thrown away quite often even with just a blown fuse. this will lower the initial starting expense and ease the burden on the wallet. using a high power resistor is recommended when testing your primaries magnetic field strength. Buforn slipped in his patent and mentioned 100 volts @ 1 amp so i would suggest this as a starting point when testing out your primaries and overall operation. even if you use 1 1/2 to 2 amp in your device i see no reason for it to have ill effects as long as the VA rating of part G's core can handle that plus headroom.
Figuera used solid iron cores but the use of laminated core will actually boost the output reducing eddy currants. also remember part G controls the currant NOT the primaries so wind them specifically as electromagnets with the highest magnetic field possible but not to saturation. also remember your output of your secondaries is split between your primaries, meaning if you are shooting for lets say 500 watts output then your primaries are accountable for half that. each primary magnetic field is responsible for 250 watts of energy thus combined supply the 500 watts to the secondary but being the square of the two output it will rise much higher than that.
balance is the whole key to this device, by just taking the reducing electromagnet down to just clear the secondary and back up will maintain the required magnetic field strength to allow the primaries to stay coherent maintaining the output to the secondaries and the load. once the device is operational and the proper fields are acquired the currant consumption of the device will drop considerably.
I hope what i have presented give the readers a clearer understanding of this device.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:33:02 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 28 January 2018 This is basically what is happening in the Figuera device 60 times a second or in other countries 50 times a second as the brush rotates on part G. as the primaries are raised and lowered in unison over the secondary. the secondary is not shown but of course it is placed right in the middle to collect the electric field. the primaries are reduced to just clear the secondary then back up while the other side is reduced. in this process the primaries retain 80 to 90% of their magnetic field reducing currant usage to a bare minimum and accelerating the E field to maximum. in this process of raising and lowering of the primaries the reducing primary has a reverse spin at the conductor causing both primary E fields to be coherent..... ie, in the same direction and in complete unison all while maintaining pressure between them. to many beers (two cases gone) and not enough aspirins i think it's time to crash. Marathonman click below to see the primaries in action. web.archive.org/web/20060525100959/http://www.gocs1.com/gocs1/Psionics/SCALARBEAMER_files/scalarbm3.gif
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:34:11 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 29 January 2018  Here is the output of the secondary in relation to the brush position on part G thus the currant flow through the primaries. Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:34:44 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 30 January 2018
In regards to that last post i posted a pic of the patent but one must remember the depiction of part G is NOT what it seems. the patent specifically states it is just a drawing for the understanding of the function of the device thus is NOT the real device as so many on you tube seem to think. at the turn of the century (1900) resistors and diodes were not even made yet so what were the options for resistance of currant. one was the use of resistance in the form of wire resistance thus still used today along with resistors which is very, very wasteful dissipating energy in the form of heat or two the use of a magnetic field to block the currant in one direction and allowing to flow in the other. in the latter almost zero energy is lost in the process with the added benefit of the ability to store energy in the form of a magnetic field. this stored magnetic field can also be used to curtail currant from the resistance of the magnetic field on the charge as it flows. since a magnetic field is like the brakes on a car it can be used to very the currant in a timely fashion in which Figuera used in part G to control currant flow. the extra benefit of storing energy in a magnetic field is when the currant is reduced energy is released into the system acting as a very short term battery feeding the system along with the reducing primary electromagnet being shoved out of the secondary thus two forms of power giving an amplification to the rising electromagnet. part G which is a large inductor with opposing fields at the brush keeps both sides of the inductor separate but as the brush rotates it adds or subtracts winding's that magnetically link or unlink to the system sides that are directly connected to the primary electromagnets thus causing an orderly rise or fall of currant. the electromagnet that is increasing will store a magnetic field in part G for the next half rotation and the electromagnet that is decreasing will release energy into the system in part G for the rising electromagnet giving it a boost.
if you think about it why in the world would someone put very thick commutator bars on a cylinder then connect it with little thin wires ? i am sorry but that is just plain ridiculous notion or thought. what is the best place to control currant and that would be within the wires or between them. using a magnetic field with reverse emf to oppose the original currant flow was sheer genius on Figuera's part. with a steady supply of currant and the change of the inductor length as the brush rotates adding or subtracting winding's magnetically linking or unlinking to the system (increasing or decreasing BEMF) will cause an orderly rise and fall of currant and this very fact can not be found in NO college text book. the use of an inductor dynamically.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Aug 26, 2019 11:36:12 GMT -6
Marathonman posted this 30 January 2018  Here is another graph to wet your willy. i have corrected the post as the spin directions of N and S are in the same direction but when looking at the face of the magnet both induced currants will be different directions thus can not be used in the Figuera device. well it is just my two cents worth referring to my video you will get a better understanding of why NS can NOT be used if you notice i have Lorentz name crossed out because Maxwell had the same equation in his notes when Lorentz was 8 years old so NO it is not the Lorentz force it is the Maxwell's force equation. things that make you go Hummmmm ! Marathonman
|
|