Figuera posts from the AU forum

Marathonman posted this 17 January 2018

That would possibly be true if it was AC but in this device we are using DC so not a phase difference. just in relation to the secondary the raising and lowering of the currant. while one is rising the other is falling or rather reducing.



Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 22 January 2018

First off that video you posted has many flaws and one of them is about a rheostat. i am sorry but part G is not in any way shape or form a rheostat as any and i mean ALL resistors waste energy in the form of heat and in this case would heat your house up. Figuera as a really smart physics professor would of course use the most efficient method he could in his device aside from the fact that the patent specifically says the drawing is just to understand it;s operation and is in no way the real device. so why in heck are people so darn determined to treat it as such is beyond me. i am still laughing at this guys sad interpretation of the Figuera device thus obviously knows nothing of the sort with a complete lack of reasoning skills that totally miss the tech of that time period. plus the graph was ripped off from my Energetic forum thread and used in that video.

secondly your theories of generators is completely flawed. i am sorry fellas this device IS NOT A TRANSFORMER in any way shape or form and you will never get anywhere if you continue to treat is as a transformer.

Yes the secondary will still exhibit and follow the lenz law as that is unavoidable but you are overlooking the fact that the field interaction is taking place outside of the primaries in the space occupied by the secondary and again the figuera device is not a transformer and you need to get that association out of your head if you are to understand this device at all and that goes for EVERYONE.

the primaries cause the initial induction in the secondary but as the currant starts to flow in the secondary and load it created a second field opposite to the first ie... lenz law. is it this field that is shoved from side to side in the secondary from the primaries. the way i understand it that once the secondary creates this second field inside of the secondary, the primary fields can easily move this field from side to side with ease with basically almost zero effort as long as the load is present.

Quote from original replicator;

this analogy is similar to that of a squirrel cage motor, there is no current or voltage going into the rotor. It develops it's own current through induction and establishes it's own magnetic field only as a result of the relative motion between the rotating field and the core. If the core catches up to the rotating field the relative motion is reduced and the current in the rotor reduces slowing down the rotor until the relative motion is fast enough to induce a stronger field in the rotor so it can be pushed around by the rotating field again. They don't combine into mutual fields as that would stop the relative motion. Without having a rotating rotor like the squirrel cage motor to provide the difference between the rotating field and the induced field on the rotor it takes a bit of creative thinking to accomplish the same effect in a stationary condition of the cores in Clemente's generator. Maybe that will resonate with your classical training. There is no electrical connection from primary to secondary and after induction in the secondary from the primary's, it produces current around the secondary (Y) which creates another field inside Y they part company and the primaries become the motive force that exerts motion onto Y provided Y is a closed circuit with resistance of it's own. motion across the circular E field in an N>N<N field with the secondary field in between the primaries.

I hope this helps.

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 24 January 2018

Since i started this journey i have had a ton of people disagree with my findings so it is nothing unusual. most of the defiance is because of the lack of understanding or the total mind set of dogma classical training. in most cases the confusion are of spin direction or the fact that we have one electromagnet coming in (increasing) and one going out (decreasing) thus changes the spin or rather the E field direction and NOT the original magnetic field which does not change. just because you are pulling a magnet away from a coil does not change the fact that the magnetic field is always in one direction, opposing.

as the secondary, with a load attached begins currant flow, the secondary will produce a opposing field according to the lenz law. it is this field that is sandwiched between the primaries and is swept across the E field that produces the output. it is just the relative motion of the primaries that causes this effect.

if the primaries are taken down to far in strength it will take to long for the magnetic field to build up and induction will drop to the rising electromagnet thus the output will fall considerably. this is why AC can never be used in the Figuera device. once the fields are up to running conditions the currant will flow through the primaries as if it was a straight piece of wire because the fields are at maximum strength and can not store any more in it's field. when the currant is reduced through part G (the controller) the primaries are still retaining a very large portion of its magnetic field so little currant is used or lost after this reducing process. the reducing is not in relation to each other but in relation to the secondary. since we have two opposing fields the width or breadth of the opposing fields will be quite large so the currant reduction of the reducing electromagnet will be small (1/3 to 1/2) to just clear the secondary then rise as the other reduces in an orderly unison fashion.

since the electromagnets are NOT controlling the currant (PART G DOES THIS) they are to be wound specifically as electromagnets with very little resistance allowing them to fulfill their intended use. this again has everyone confused as most are use to winding them with resistance that controls currant flow and this would not be the case in the Figuera device as PART G controls the currant flow NOT the primaries. the primaries are not wound according to present day teachings because of the before mentioned fact. when testing primary electromagnets a high power resistor is handy to have as the low resistance of the primaries will freak out a power supply so additional resistance is helpful.

the secondaries on the other hand ARE wound according to present day teachings just as any standard generator would be.

since all the currant will be governed by part G and basically will be the power supply once the starting power is removed it is suggested to make sure the wire wound on part G not only has little ohms (resistance) but is large enough that it can handle the currant it is to supply the system plus headroom. part G stores and releases energy in the form of a magnetic field combines with the reducing electromagnets inductive kick into part G at that very moment causing an amplification to the rising electromagnet. this also store considerable power in a magnetic field to feed set S the next half rotation when set S is set to increase and set N is decreasing. the N-N field at the positive brush allows the inductance of the two inputs to be governed separately but in complete unison. the addition or subtraction of winding's as the brush rotates will cause them to magnetically link or unlink to the system thus the opposition to currant flow will rise and fall in an orderly fashion using self inductance (magnetic fields) to control currant flow at an efficiency that not a single resistor on this planet can touch. the addition of the secondary attached to the system is there to supply currant from losses and aides in the amplification process to the rising electromagnet.

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 24 January 2018

Actually a very high percentage can't even get past the drawing even though it specifically say in the patent "FOR UNDERSTANDING OF THE FUNCTION" and is in no way the real working device.

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 25 January 2018



It's all about charge and discharge thus the spin direction is very important .

Marathonman

Marathonman posted this 28 January 2018


This is basically what is happening in the Figuera device 60 times a second or in other countries 50 times a second as the brush rotates on part G. as the primaries are raised and lowered in unison over the secondary. the secondary is not shown but of course it is placed right in the middle to collect the electric field. the primaries are reduced to just clear the secondary then back up while the other side is reduced. in this process the primaries retain 80 to 90% of their magnetic field reducing currant usage to a bare minimum and accelerating the E field to maximum. in this process of raising and lowering of the primaries the reducing primary has a reverse spin at the conductor causing both primary E fields to be coherent..... ie, in the same direction and in complete unison all while maintaining pressure between them.

to many beers (two cases gone) and not enough aspirins i think it's time to crash.

Marathonman

click below to see the primaries in action.

web.archive.org/web/20060525100959/http://www.gocs1.com/gocs1/Psionics/SCALARBEAMER_files/scalarbm3.gif

Marathonman posted this 30 January 2018

In regards to that last post i posted a pic of the patent but one must remember the depiction of part G is NOT what it seems. the patent specifically states it is just a drawing for the understanding of the function of the device thus is NOT the real device as so many on you tube seem to think. at the turn of the century (1900) resistors and diodes were not even made yet so what were the options for resistance of currant. one was the use of resistance in the form of wire resistance thus still used today along with resistors which is very, very wasteful dissipating energy in the form of heat or two the use of a magnetic field to block the currant in one direction and allowing to flow in the other. in the latter almost zero energy is lost in the process with the added benefit of the ability to store energy in the form of a magnetic field. this stored magnetic field can also be used to curtail currant from the resistance of the magnetic field on the charge as it flows. since a magnetic field is like the brakes on a car it can be used to very the currant in a timely fashion in which Figuera used in part G to control currant flow. the extra benefit of storing energy in a magnetic field is when the currant is reduced energy is released into the system acting as a very short term battery feeding the system along with the reducing primary electromagnet being shoved out of the secondary thus two forms of power giving an amplification to the rising electromagnet. part G which is a large inductor with opposing fields at the brush keeps both sides of the inductor separate but as the brush rotates it adds or subtracts winding's that magnetically link or unlink to the system sides that are directly connected to the primary electromagnets thus causing an orderly rise or fall of currant. the electromagnet that is increasing will store a magnetic field in part G for the next half rotation and the electromagnet that is decreasing will release energy into the system in part G for the rising electromagnet giving it a boost.

if you think about it why in the world would someone put very thick commutator bars on a cylinder then connect it with little thin wires ? i am sorry but that is just plain ridiculous notion or thought. what is the best place to control currant and that would be within the wires or between them. using a magnetic field with reverse emf to oppose the original currant flow was sheer genius on Figuera's part. with a steady supply of currant and the change of the inductor length as the brush rotates adding or subtracting winding's magnetically linking or unlinking to the system (increasing or decreasing BEMF) will cause an orderly rise and fall of currant and this very fact can not be found in NO college text book. the use of an inductor dynamically.

Marathonman