|
Post by Marathonman on Sept 4, 2021 11:58:30 GMT -6
An AC variac relies on a constant rise and fall of current to achieve inductive reactance to control voltage/current flow. when the current is traveling through the whole continuous coil there will be a lot of inductive reactance thus very little output. when you turn the nob to shorten the circuit the voltage/current rises as there is much less inductive reactance to oppose.
Figuera did the exact same thing as above only using DC thus the reason for the needed continuous movement which increase and decrease in size of both circuits in complete unison to achieve ongoing inductive reactance. since there are two feeds coming into part G (set N & S) there will be opposing fields at the brush which essentially split the active inductor in two which allows both feeds to be controlled in complete unison 180 degrees from each other. one will be increasing while the other will be decreasing thus allowing the collision point of the two fields to be moved from one end of the secondary to the other in a continuous fashion thus ongoing induction of the secondary.
Part G is an active inductor controller plain and simple, that uses inductive reactance to control current flow of both sets of electromagnets. this device can NOT function properly without the active inductor that stores and releases potential that actually becomes a mixing amplifier of the signal to achieve self sustainment. "R" in the patent is just for the comprehension of the device ONLY ! thus does not exist. it is a representation of a certain amount of resistance at that specific contact point as the brush rotates, nothing more.
any other arrangement or idea of what part "G" or "R" is will be a complete fallacy in Alice in wonderland.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Sept 6, 2021 9:15:08 GMT -6
I am sorry for being so blunt and harsh but it always amazes me as the the follies people present when concerning the 1908 patent. you and many, many others forget the most important words from the patent.
"To fix ideas is convenient to refer to the attached drawing which is no more than a sketch to understand the operation of the machine built using the principle outlined before"
I do not understand why everyone seems to selectively and conveniently skip this statement which is "one" of the most important aspects of the patent. also in the patent "it is drawn in it's elementary manor to facilitate the comprehension of the device", then you have to ask yourselves what then can it be.?
If the resistance "R" is drawn just for comprehension then ask yourself where is the resistance coming from. as i have stated from previous posts the resistance is in the form of inductive reactance and resides within the core or rather between the wire in the form of inductive reactance. no Physics professor would use heat death resistors in a self sustaining device plain and simple. I also have to add that it would be impractical to show all the winding's on part G which would make the patent drawing overly complicated. It was reduced to just get the point across and worded as such.
part G is an active inductor controller and in the drawing it shows only the brush travel and not the rest of the core. Quote ; "in its rotation movement, is placed in communication with the commutator bars or contacts of a ring distributor or cylinder whose contacts are in communication with a resistance whose value varies from a maximum to a minimum and vice versa". he just gave three such scenarios that are describing the brush rotation so for anyone that takes the drawing as Gospel is fooling themselves. Figuera just described a continuous winding on a closed core and as such the brush rotates in a circle which will vary the inductive reactance of both feeds simultaneously in complete unison.
also; "characterized by two series of electromagnets which form the inductor circuit, between whose poles the reels of the induced are properly placed." notice it does "NOT" say over those pole as in your device, it says between those poles. again a complete misunderstanding of the patent.
Occam's razor is so applicable here. The term razor refers to distinguishing between two or more hypotheses either by "shaving away" unnecessary assumptions or cutting apart similar conclusions.
PS. If you think you can build this device without the active inductor controller you are sadly mistaken whether it be mechanical or electronic switching.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Sept 15, 2021 9:28:11 GMT -6
Even i do not have all the answers, yet i have way more then most. why??? because i have very intensely studied this device for years applying Occam's Razor theorem at every step of the way. reducing everything learned to it's lowest form or reality possible.
Part G is an active inductor controller because applying the above theorem tells me i am right. "R" does not exist off of the patent drawing because it is just for the understanding only in it's most elementary form for understanding "only". with "R" being nonexistent then the resistance must reside in or around the wire it's self and if that is the case then Part G must use inductive reactance to control current flow the same as an AC variac.
AC variac's use alternating current flow to attain ongoing inductive reactance. this is not true for a DC driven device thus the reason for some kind of movement of either the field or the circuit it's self. Figuera increased and decreased the DC circuit to attain ongoing induction which according to Faraday fulfills his induction law of increasing and decreasing the flux as the circuit increases and decreases thus the reason for the rotating brush for ongoing inductive reactance of both feeds 180 degrees from each other in complete unison.
the primaries "MUST" be longer then the secondary, WHY ? because the reluctance of not only the gap between the primary's and the secondary's but also the return air path of the poles themselves at the collision point being swept back and fourth. in order for the field to be strong enough to bridge the air gap and return path the winding's must be substantial. the ampere turn's required negates a longer core to support the amount of ampere turns needed to bridge the gap and return path without going over 1/2 inch winding depth. anything over 1/2 inch winding depth is a waste of copper thus causing adverse effects of adding resistance and self inductance to skyrocket in your primaries.
Why is there an air gap between the primaries and secondary's.
if the winding's of both were on the same core the hysteresis and eddy currents of the secondary AC output would interfere with the primary DC driven magnetic fields causing them to reduce in output. NOT GOOD. primary's are increased and decreased in current only thus NEVER reversal which would cause the total field collapse thus complete induction failure. reversing the magnetic domains is way to slow to attain ongoing induction so the best way to do it is the Figuera way. to increase and decrease the DC current flow of the electromagnets in the most efficient way possible.
Figuera separated them for noninerference as the collision point of the two primary fields is in a space outside the primary's core occupied by the secondary. even a total short of the secondary output will not have any such adverse effects on the primary's core as all induction is outside both cores. this design allows the primary's to do their job of being electromagnets thus should be designed and wound specifically and accordingly.
Please "DO NOT" take the patent drawing literally as this will lead you nowhere very fast.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 2, 2021 18:46:55 GMT -6
So swamped with work it's not funny. have not had a day off in weeks with over 4 weeks backlog. i do not know when i can resume working on the Figuera device with the closest window 30 days out. it seems everybody and their brother needs remodeling or painting done. heck i just finished a rush job roof leak that flooded the whole room at the fire place. my mini lab is set up but i have no time right now and the money is good for the taking on these jobs. please forgive the absence and follow the advice and description of the Figuera device i have laid out.
see you soon.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by greywolf47 on Oct 2, 2021 19:19:47 GMT -6
Thanks for the update on your status. I am also moving and have my project on hold until November.
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 6, 2021 14:12:29 GMT -6
To bad, hate to hear that.
to all.
most people in the general public and/or so called educated through the Rockefeller controlled education system do no realize we have been flat out lied to or at the bare minimum manipulated on a massive scale. do you not think the power elites would stop at nothing to hide any and all avenues of free energy losing the tight grip of control. you damn right they would ! the IDIOT Einstein was put into place to derail all Physics and science as we know it then relay on their controlled education system to and minions to squash all resistance. will continue later,
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 6, 2021 21:27:11 GMT -6
I am sure you know the minion type that would swear on a stack of elite manipulated bibles that all our laws are written in stone and can not be broken. if that was the case that free energy ie more out then in, is not possible then so is the existence of our universe and all living mater not possible.
Physics started to be derailed in 1880 to 1890 when the power elite realized that not only are Maxwell's free energy equations dangerous to their pocket book but all other scientist and physicist's that believed in the Aether that laid the foundation for out present day society are the sworn enemies of them. the only way to stop the train was to derail it or send it on the wrong way track which is what happened. out of the eight people that were narrowed down to they picked Einstein the puppet then arranged everything to appear as if he was a genius not a moron as in real life. so the journey began to give the bafoon all the credit from other physisist work as in plagiarism to the tenth degree and soon the fool was a hero not a ZERO !
his IQ was no where near the posted 170 the elites posted for him, it was near 80 to 90 in the real world. he was so ignorant he failed almost every class at age 15 and quit school. so you mean i am suppose to believe he wrote ground breaking papers at age 16. I say BULL F-IN SHIT !
the human race can not afford to listen to these greedy sick people any longer and expect to survive. hell neither Einstein nor Hawking the theoretical idiot has not one single patent between them yet i am not to believe Tesla or Figuera for that matter which mind you had 5 working models taken to the patent office that WORKED ! of which his 1908 was his crown jewel.
they sky is the limit or rather the universe i should say.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by greywolf47 on Oct 14, 2021 18:26:01 GMT -6
MM, if you want some really interesting reading about the early years of electrical knowledge, writing of Oliver Heavyside and his rebuttal of Maxwell's equations is VERY informative. It is about 500 pages and from about 1870. I found it and downloaded it from the NET. I will see if I can get a reference url to send. I am making my first trip of my move on Saturday.
|
|
peter
New Member
Posts: 24
|
Post by peter on Oct 22, 2021 6:07:01 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 27, 2021 10:54:37 GMT -6
Thank you greywolf47 and i hope your move is much more pleasant then mine was. (1893 was the year) also thank you (long time no hear) peter for the links but i must inform you two that Heaviside was part of the Symmetrizing of our present system that derailed physics and science as we know it. he was also paid to do so as was Lorrentz and others, which more then likely was his downfall as the kids were more then likely paid to stone him that was the start that lead to his death. i will read them just the same yet i do not trust his work or others like him. the only good thing i think came from Heaviside was the fact he solved the transatlantic blunder that pissed off the British Royals and invented coax cable.
Thanks, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Nov 28, 2021 13:01:44 GMT -6
I will be ramping up my work finally in the next few days so thing will be looking up on my design and build efforts which are long over due. i am sure everyone else will be please to hear this.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Dec 3, 2021 15:02:20 GMT -6
When you are studying and building your replicas you must keep in mind that Figuera used his opposing electromagnets to compress the field lines to that of a standard generator high intensity field then reduced one increasing the other to get the sweeping action across the secondary. each time it is swept from side to side you are moving the collision point from gap to gap ONLY. each electromagnet is accountable for 1/2 the intensity of the secondary field compressing the field lines to that of the standard generator. in the pic below looking at the secondary i have drawn some imaginary field lines so you can get a general idea what to accomplish. i can not draw the field lines separating after the collision point but my point is to see the area occupied by the secondary. this is where all the field line compression takes place matching that of a standard generator. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Dec 7, 2021 22:08:21 GMT -6
"Inductive reactance is a property exhibited by an inductor, and inductive reactance exists based on the fact that an electric current produces a magnetic field around it. In the context of an AC circuit (although this concept applies any time current is changing), this magnetic field is constantly changing as a result of current that oscillates back and forth. It is this change in magnetic field that induces another electric current to flow in the same wire (counter-EMF), in a direction such as to oppose the flow of the current originally responsible for producing the magnetic field (known as Lenz's Law) "
While this statement is 100 % correct is it has contradiction 1. "although this concept applies any time current is changing" which by the way can be DC and "this magnetic field is constantly changing as a result of current that oscillates back and forth".
currents that oscillate has nothing to do with the creation of a magnetic field it is the rise and fall that creates Inductive Reactance. sure it may be flowing in the opposite direction but that is NOT what creates inductive reactance. as it states "applies any time current is changing" meaning it can be any type of current ie. DC as long as it is rising and falling constantly. if the magnetic field is constantly changing it is because the current is constantly changing from high to low and vise verse thus nothing to do with any oscillation what so ever.
so if you expand the circuit you create more inductive reactance (Opposition to the current flow C -EMF ie Lenz Law) which in turn lowers the current flow thus giving DC current a continuous rise and fall of current thus inductive reactance. as long as the circuit is continuously expanding and contracting within the time constant of the circuit you will achieve inductive reactance.
all Figuera did was split one large inductor in two with the use of opposing magnetic fields which allowed him to control two feeds separately, expanding one while the other is contracting then vise verse in complete unison. using an active inductor allowed Figuera to Cycle the release potential back into the system to help power the other half of the system then add a secondary feed back to replace losses and give rise to amplification.
Regards. Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Dec 16, 2021 11:18:05 GMT -6
Hello everyone,
I or rather a friend of mine and i have a serious problem with an internet provider. what they are doing is basically raping people of their hard earned money. i refuse to pay almost 300 buck for 5mbs internet. so we are cancelling them and i hope i can tell someone in the company's upper management to go F^$k themselves.
we, the people of this world, are being taken advantage of from these greedy disgusting multinational companies and destroying our environment at the same time and i refuse to take part in this BS any longer. i will not be on line for a few weeks until i can find some semi reasonable provider that isn't trying to get rich over night. in Houston i was paying 50 buck for 18 to 22 mbs and was happy but this 300 dollar BS has to end.
I am also starting a petition to sue them so over the next 6 months i will be colleting signatures demanding compensation and lower prices.(Covid BS Screwing)
STAND UP AND FIGHT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS !
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Jan 21, 2022 14:18:08 GMT -6
Just a reminder to everyone;
Figuera designed his stationary generator to mimic a standard rotating generator which has four poles and Figuera only two. in doing so he used the two poles to compress the field lines to match that of the standard geny high intensity field then shifted the collision point from gap to gap all while maintaining field line pressure. you have to have proper pressure between your electromagnets and proper sweep from gap to gap or your device will no generate properly.
part G must be calculated to handle all lower sum's of power draw plus a little head room and that the device might not work properly without necessary proper feed back into the system... ie.. multiple sets of electromagnets when reduced release their stored magnetic field back into the system plus the half of part G and the secondary feed back.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|