|
|
Post by Marathonman on Feb 9, 2023 14:22:35 GMT -6
If you still think you can't get more out of a system then put in then I suggest you rethink your strategy. Here is a video of a real Teacher that know how to push the boundaries.
Using the STEM concept he pushes the boundaries going faster then the wind could carry him.
In his other video's he has a 10,000 dollar bet with another physics professor that this entre concept will fail and can't be done. Just guess who lost the bet and who is 10,000 dollars richer.
NEVER BEIEVE MAINSTREAM SCIENCE AND PHYSICS! THEY ARE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY THE POWER ELITE!
Regards,
Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Feb 9, 2023 15:01:56 GMT -6
The concept can also be directed to energy. We have always been told that perpetual motion was impossible yet our world has been hurling through space at an unbelievable speed and spiraling around our sun at the same time. This has been happening for million and millions of years unabated. IS THAT NOT PERPETUAL ENOUGH FOR YA! Maxwell's original equations prove more can be had from a system then put in yet the power elite controlled Physics professors and elite controlled higher learning institutions state free energy or an abundant excess energy is impossible. BULLSHIT! The video below is a reeducation of how electricity behaves. Some foolish people that are so stuck on electron movement will never grasp just how real electricity behaves in a system. If you think free electrons in a copper wire (ROTFLMAO AU!) are what transfers the energy then just maybe one needs to reeducate themselves. This video is by far the most sane explanation of how the transfer of electricity happens. It is the electric and magnetic fields that carry the electricity NOT electrons. The wires or electric traces are the boundary for the electric and magnetic fields and thus mold around the boundaries set, IE.... the dielectric reflector, otherwise know as a conductor. Also stated and verified by Eric Dollard that electricity in those high voltage power lines flows between those three lines NOT in them. Power flows on the outside of the wire not inside. At no time does the electricity from the power company EVER enter your house. Since the so called carriers are shifted back and fourth along the wire and the actual movement of the so called electron never leave that system, it can in NO way power your house with electricity. The power company sets the conditions for energy production in your house ONLY!, "Think Dipole!" The electric and magnetic fields are created locally which draw in the power from the dipole (Counterspace) created within the system. By the way this can be done by the owner of the house and never pay the electric company again. The Figuera device sets the dipole conditions to create energy over the secondary in between. The primary exciting system excites the dipoles along with preserving the exciting potential in the active inductor controller which reuse the potential over and over with the secondary feedback to replace the losses. The Figuera device sets the conditions for energy production and produces energy within the same device yet only needs a little starting potential to achieve this. What I love about this guy is he is the one that actually calls out those mainstream dogma taught nay sayers and nails them against the wall. Can you just imagine how they feel when the realization sets in that all that money spent on dogma taught education was a complete waste of time lol!
Also the fact that no one realizes or chooses to ignore is JJ Thompson even said (ELECTRON THEORY) that it could be possible that he was wrong and electrons don't exist. YES!, I did say "THEORY" because electrons have NEVER BEEN PROVEN and relativity has been proven wrong at least 15 times. Imagine that!
Live free, Die free! Regards, Marathonman |
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Feb 17, 2023 15:45:28 GMT -6
It is a little stretch for people that are classical closed box Einstein taught. I even have a problem with the voltage coming from the battery in the field presented by him. I have know electricity flows on the outside of the wire for at least 15 years. I knew it molded to the wire on the outside and I have also studied JJ Thompson and his theories on the electron fore which I am completely against. What kills me is people take these theories as gospel and some even know he and the idiot Einstein were wrong yet don't have the balls to step forward. Hell Einstein has been proven wrong at least 15 times by reputable physics professors yet goofballs seem to cling to absurdities. 
Michael Tellinger has a video out of an energy particle being photographed. Where he got it I don't remember but it clearly has NO orbital rings of the so called spinning electrons. What the energy particle does have is rings of pressure waves or vibration rings about 8 or 9 of them. Since I clearly do believe a lot of his work as it does coincide with Tesla's description of the universe of sound, frequency and vibration, I surely think our universe is much more then F-in electron balls flowing through a wire like water through a hose....I am still laughing on that one! 
First photograph of an so called electron.
One thing for sure is I do believe electricity is formed and flows when ever there is magnetic and electric fields and propagated by them whether a wire is there or not. That and the fact that all conductors are a dielectric reflector and as such will flow on the outside of the wire. If you take out an electron from copper it will no longer be copper but something else which i see no copper wire changing on this planet. Our universe has billions of amps and volts flowing all the time between stars and other galaxies. Apparently it did not get the memo from man that it can only flow through a wire. 
Our universe is in constant motion which produces millions and millions of volts and amps completely on it's own without man, creating stars, planets and life on it's own. It has been doing this for millions of years and will continue to do so millions of years after we are gone so just because some stupid humans don't believe in perpetual motion doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It just means those people have to reeducate themselves and forget about the universe revolving around them.
Together we can figure this universe out and bring humanity back to where we need to be. Striving to better humanity as a team.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Feb 22, 2023 14:38:09 GMT -6
Magnetic Amplifiers and the Figuera device
Magnetic Amplifiers: How They Work, What They Do.
Forgotten and Rediscovered. Magnetic amplifiers came into being when the century was just one year old. It would be six years - in 1907 - before a youngster named Lee de Forest would make news with his audion, the world's first vacuum-tube amplifier. And the transistor was still 47 years in the future.
For a while, it looked as though the magnetic amplifier would hold its own against that upstart, the audion. In 1916, E. F. W. Alexanderson, the electronic pioneer, employed magnetic amplifiers to modulate his early transmitters and many World War I transmitting stations used his circuits. By the early 20's, however, the flashy vacuum tube had taken over, and the "magnetic" was almost forgotten in this country. It was not forgotten in Germany, however, as we found out when World War II started. In the years between the wars, the Germans had brought the magnetic amplifier to a high state of development. War-time found them using magnetics for reliable, accurate, and trouble-free control of everything from gun turrets to automatic pilot systems, and they even used them in the V2 rockets.
Awakened to the possibilities inherent in this design, Allied scientists began to push the development of magnetic amplifiers. Before much progress had been made, though, the war was over. But the spark had been kindled, and a few years later Vickers Inc. (now a division of Sperry Rand) came out with the first commercially produced magnetics.
By that time, interest had been aroused all over the world. In the following decade, hundreds of other firms, including all the big names in electrical and electronic equipment, have added magnetics to their product lines. And almost no branch of industry now operates without them.
Flux Controls Current. A modern-day magnetic amplifier is, essentially, nothing more than an iron core with two or more coils of wire wound around it. In construction and appearance, it is similar to a transformer. But there the similarity ends.
A magnetic amplifier - or saturable reactor, as it is sometimes called - is a true amplifier. Like a vacuum tube, it uses a small signal to control a large one. But there are sharp differences. Where the vacuum tube controls a current flowing to a d.c. power supply, the magnetic amplifier controls an a.c. flow. While the vacuum tube is primarily a voltage amplifier, the magnetic is a power amplifier. And where the vacuum tube uses voltage variations to control a flow of electrons, the magnetic amplifier controls current flow through a coil by varying magnetic flux.
A d.c. current flowing through the control winding will cause a build-up of magnetic flux in the iron core. The greater the flux, the lower will be the impedance of the output winding. With a lower impedance in the circuit, more current will flow from the a.c. power supply through the output winding and the load.
When the current in the control winding reaches a certain point, the core is said to be saturated, which means that it has all the flux it can hold. At this point, the impedance of the output winding is very low, and the current through the load is very high. On the other hand, when there is no control current flowing, and consequently no flux in the core, the output impedance is extremely high, and practically no current flows through the output winding or the load. Thus, by controlling the current through the control winding, the output winding impedance, and consequently the current through the load, is made continuously variable.
The moral of this story is that flux had been used to control current flow since 1900 if not before and I would bet my life that Figuera being a past physics professor knew exactly that flux can control current flow in the most efficient manor possible. Granted Figuera's active inductor controller is a bit different then the magnetic amplifier yet uses the same principal to control current flow (FLUX). The Lenz law and Faraday's inductance laws hard at work as each winding added to that side of the circuit increases the flux that opposes the original current flow.
I would suggest all you ney sayer's stop your mouth from flapping BS and take the time to REEDUCATE YOURSELF. All the physics facts I have posted can be verified with this device and the fact that he had 5 working patents presented and signed by the patent offices.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Feb 22, 2023 15:14:36 GMT -6
Additional words on mag amps.
While the two differ substantially the underlying reactance is the same. The magnetic amplifier uses core saturation to control the flow of AC current. If the control winding was not present the AC coil produces so much reactance that "NO" current can flow through the coil or very, very little. This is called inductive reactance and is "EXACTLY" the same as the Figuera device active inductor controller.
The DC control coil is then added to slowly saturate the magamp core thus reducing the ability of the core to full react to the AC sine wave (Lenz Law). The further the DC winding is increased the more core saturation the more current is allowed to flow in the AC coil. The DC winding nullifies the AC reactive component in the magnetic amplifier yet in the Figuera device the reactive component is allowed to control the current flow all by it self.
With the addition and subtraction of windings on the core the reactive component is increased and decreased (opposition to current flow) thus gives the DC current frequency and we all know inductive reactance can and will control current flow in the most efficient manor possible on this planet. Again the inductive reactive component has been used since 1900 if not before and the Multinational Corporations do not want you to know this, suppressing this information saturating our lives with electronics and lining their pockets. When they say new and improved, you have to ask yourself "Who is this improvement benefiting" them or us. You will find it ALWAYS benefits them as in more profit and us less product or not as good.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Feb 24, 2023 15:16:34 GMT -6
Here shortly I will be posting a video on the topic of the inverse square law. Basically I will be talking about the length that a free standing electromagnet will project a magnetic field past it's core. What most people don't realize is the magnetic field will only project out the length of the actual core it self. This is the reason as to why I have been saying that the primary to secondary ratio should be no less than 2 to 1 and the fact that the patent specifically shown this.
I will show everyone that the inverse square law is a very fundamental law that should be followed when designing and building your primaries for the figuera device.
I am presently locked out of Youtube because of the sorry ass Google BS. I hope to resolve this suppression shortly.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Feb 28, 2023 21:15:40 GMT -6
I need to apologize to everyone for a mistake I had made. In the last large video I posted where I compare the active inductor controller in the Figuera device to a Variac was a mistake. I was suppose to be comparing it to the Magamp NOT the Variac. The Variac uses transformer action to increase and decrease the output while it is the Magamp that uses inductance to control current flow. I have no clue what I was thinking at that time other than I was working on a Variac and mentally got them crossed.
I have been trying to work with sorry google since they are the ones that own youtube now. I have been locked out for quite a while now and have had no way to correct it. I was hopping to resolve it a long time a go but Google is being an ass wipe. There chrome browser was blocking me on Ebay and I am locked out of there also with a perfect buying record. F them both!
Honestly I thing my account was possible highjacked possibly as was my google browser. My computer always comes up clean though as it can not fart without me knowing about it.
So as soon as I am able to I will pull the video and make the necessary changes to reflect the proper information. Please remember it is a MAGAMP that uses inductance to control current control and so does the active inductor controller just a little different though.
Again I do Apologize to everyone, members and readers alike. I had gone through everything else to make sure no more mistakes and all good!
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Mar 1, 2023 14:50:12 GMT -6
AC!, ARE YOU KIDDING ME!.
I am dying laughing right now and my stomach hurts. I was just looking at OU a little while ago and some clown is still trying to use AC to power the electromagnets on the figuera device. It is quite obvious he knows nothing about magnetics and magnetic domain structure.
I hate to be mean or the barer of bad news but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out AC does NOT make the best electromagnets and produces heat. Why in the world would someone want to or attempt to make an AC electromagnet when NOT ONE GENERATING DEVICE ON THIS PLANET uses AC as a source for electromagnets. Every single device that produces AC has DC electromagnets because it is a known FACT that DC electromagnets are by far the strongest most efficient electromagnets.
The reason AC is NOT used to power electromagnets is because flipping the domain twice in one period is so pathetically slow and produces a ton of heat. When the AC rises in current flow to its peak the magnetic domains are still trying to flip from the previous direction (Hysteresis). It takes a lot of time and power to flip domains and the fact that in this process of flipping these domains (Hysteresis) heat is produced which is a waste of potential and is non recoverable. Through every flip of each domain (Hysteresis) the ones on the outside of the core are easily flipped but the closer you get to the core the farther away from the magnetic fields of the wire you are. In AC electromagnets a lot of domain never get flipped in the center of the core and as such reduces the overall strength of the electromagnet substantially. In fact, there will be more current flowing in the DC electromagnet than the AC electromagnet (no inductive reactance in the circuit), so it will be a much, much stronger magnet!. Yes!, AC electromagnets have substantial Hysteresis and inductive reactance every time the domains are flipped.
Not one Scientist, Physicist or Engineer uses an AC electromagnet because they are completely inferior (Hysteresis issues) to that of a DC electromagnet. True that they are used on motors and was one of Tesla's shinning achievements, yet AC is still not used in electromagnets because DC is much superior in all aspects. With DC electromagnets there is no flipping of domains as they are always in the same direction. The current is only raised and lowered never reversed like that of AC. The speed at which the magnet can be raised and lowered is unbelievably much faster thus able to maintain the field line compression and sweep with relative ease.
SO on that note; Do you honestly think a prior physicist, teacher and Engineer would use an inferior form of power to excite his electromagnets knowing very well DC is far superior?. Good god I think NOT!. Figuera used DC to excite his electromagnets and according to the patent were specifically wound as electromagnets to produce the highest magnetization possible without taking in account of the secondary.
Making a mistake is inevitable as we are humans and as such use only a certain amount of our brain.. I to have made mistakes yet I strive to correct them and learn in the process especially when I first started this adventure. Thinking AC will work in this device to power the electromagnets is plain ignorance and the lack of proper reasoning is completely beyond me even when the device patent says there is a commutator turned by a small motor in this device meaning it is DC.
So please ask yourself, "Do I want to use piss pore quality electromagnets or an I going to use the strongest most efficient electromagnets possible to create the most output i can?"
YOU DECIDE!
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 15, 2023 11:50:43 GMT -6
Contrary to many mouths and self appointed KNOW -IT- ALL's on many site, usually the one's with the biggest mouths know the least about the device in question. The biggest mouth runner (Opposer) usually cries it violates the conservation of energy and as such can never be a self runner. Here lies the problem, If the mouth runner in question know absolutely NOTHING of the device then how on earth does the mouth runner know which specific law the device in question is violating. The moronic mouth runner can not know because he or she has NO clue how it operates in the first place. Nor do they actually know how a simple standard rotating generator functions. The feedback to the excitors in a standard generator is STUPIDLY SMALL compared to its output. Putting aside the massive lenz law reaction in the secondary coils, the device could be OU if not for that. A standard generator takes 10 to 15% of it's output sending it back to the exciting side of the system. Thats it, just 10 to 15% and the device puts out kilowatts of kinetic energy so how is this possible. For one the excitor electromagnets are DC driven meaning they are rectified before they are powered. DC electromagnets put out a substantial amount of pressure far superior to that of AC because of the constant voltage and amperage. Aside from that, the exciting side preserves the exciting potential not wasting it or bleeding off. Once the potential in the exciting side has climbed to it's running potential the pressure in that system is maintained. If the draw is increased in the secondary then more pressure (Potential) is sent to the excitors to output that specific load then maintaining it. The exiting side primaries, AVR and the secondary output side are two separate systems working in tandem. The exciting potential could not maintain the secondary output if the exciting potential was AC. Sorry not gonna happen in a million years and the reason why DC is used in electromagnets and energy production around the world by every physicist and electric engineer. What is the principle of conservation of energy?In physics, the term conservation refers to something which doesn't change. This means that the variable in an equation which represents a conserved quantity is constant over time. It has the same value both before and after an event. Quote from a physics cabal site;"Though often interesting curiosities, such a perpetual motion machine has never been shown to be perpetual, nor could it ever be. In fact, even if such a machine were to exist, it wouldn't be very useful. It would have no ability to do work. Note that this differs from the concept of the over-unity machine, which is said to output more than 100% of the energy put into it, in clear violation of the principle of conservation of energy." Clearly complete speculation on the professors because of their cabal teaching when in reality the world had been spinning while rotation around our sun while the entire system is hurling through space at an ungoodly speed. Would that be awkward if the world stopped spinning tomorrow because the cabal professor said it isn't possible. Apparently the universe did not get that memo. Apparently he to forgot how a standard generator works using only 10 to 15% of its output to create kilowatts of kinetic energy. Remove the Lenz Law effects and there will be no need for the gas guzzling motor which is exactly what Figuera did. While this is true for a transformer type system this is COMPLETELY FALSE for a motional induced system like that of a generator that produces Kinetic energy with motion. Maxwell proved through his ORIGINAL EQUATIONS (NOT HEAVISIDE's TRUMPED UP EQUATIONS) that more can be had from a moving motional system then put in with the standard generator is a prime example. Of course the Lenz Law rears it's ugly head when you draw energy from the secondary which then produces reverse torque on the rotor and the generator boggs down. Making the generating system non- moving like in the Figuera device does the same thing as a standard generator except it removes the massive Lenz Law effect and as such no longer needs the huge gasoline guzzling motor to turn the shaft. All that is needed is a very small motor to turn the brush or brushes and the commutator. Heaviside and Lorenz were paid to rid all evidence of extra energy then JP Morgan took all existing school books being used out of circulation and had them rewritten to hide the fact that excess energy is possible then put those doctored up books back into the education system. (FACT) So think about that for a moment, do you NOT THINK these cabal's that are controlling the world would not put a system of control into place to hide all existence of excess energy. Sure they did, it's called the education system, Physics communities, Patent offices, Banking and energy cabals. It all started around 1890 when the likes of Tesla scared the shit out of them with the possibility of loosing their control. Einstein (Clown in a Purple Suit) was put into place to shove false idea's down the world public throats and to halt all advances of Science and Physics as we know it. What we are left with is their little minions running around the net destroying good valuable information that proves excess energy is in fact possible. SO honestly all you mouth runners I can care less what your limited intellect status quo mind thinks about the Clemente Figuera device or any other such device that puts out excess energy. The banking and energy cabal's have tried to hide all facts that excess energy does in fact exist and I myself will keep on trying until the day I can no longer breath. Living in the cabal control box is your choice entirely but paying these cabal for your energy is not and they will do everything in their power to keep you in THEIR BOX OF CONTROL! forking over your time while using their cabal worthless paper money to enslaving you to them. Regards, ADMIN. |
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Mar 19, 2023 9:44:53 GMT -6
To Commutate or not to Commutate that is the question.
By the way if in your review of all the patents but specifically the 1908 patent, which you should be studying profusely It says at one point "Brush or group of brushes and the commutator." He slyly refers to the commutator in passing as if it means nothing "A straightner of current if wanted to" in one of his other patents. He then goes on to say in his 1908 patent;
"Naturally in every revolution of the brush will be a change of sign in the induced current; but a switch will do it continuous if wanted." And "From this current is derived a small part to excite the machine converting it in self-exciting and to operate the small motor which moves the brush and the switch;"
So like I said at first he nonchalantly mentions it in passing then goes on to specifically include it in the system. What he mean by "Switch will do it of wanted" is a commutator. Before the time of the Diode electrical Engineers had to use a commutator all the time. Now a days a bridge rectifier is mostly used but especially in motors it is still used.
So ask yourself "Why would he need a commutator" because this device is DC driven and he needed the commutator to turn the AC secondary feedback to the system into DC and that is what the commutator is specifically for. He then goes on to give DC ac like qualities of increase and decrease current flow and able to control current flow with inductive reactance which I have already explained many times on this site.
A good suggestion would be to gather up all the patents and read them one by one even the Buforn patents as they do give a few extra subtle clues. Start with the first 1902 ending with 1914.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Mar 23, 2023 13:17:54 GMT -6
I was just reviewing Battery University for my rebuild battery business as I use any and all info for references. I was reading the biography of Isidor Buchmann
Isidor Buchmann grew up in a conservative farming community in Switzerland. From early childhood, he was fascinated with radio communication and during his high school years he built a broadcast radio that ran with no power — it required only an antenna and a ground connection (it didn’t use a battery). Isidor sold several of these radio receivers.
Hold the damn phone, what did the article just say "a broadcast radio that ran with no power — it required only an antenna and a ground connection (it didn’t use a battery)."
But wait!, according to our present day physics and all their brain dead minions frantically running around stating free energy is impossible. I just can't help but laughing my ass off every time one of them opens their mouth lol!
We live on a metal ball hurling through a sea of energy with a thimble size could power you for life yet there is no such thing as free energy. You can't help but wonder about these very closed minded Sheeple of whether or not they are actually humans or robots.
PS. Isidor Buchmann is another impressive person I would love to meet.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Mar 26, 2023 15:48:20 GMT -6
Just doing some Pondering today enjoying my restful day. Then the elusive electron popped into my head and yes I am still laughing at that one. Over the last couple of years I have came across a few other that did not believe the so called electron even existed at all. Hell even JJ Thompson who theorized the electron in the first place said he might be wrong. It is a fact to this day the electron is still a theory as is Einstein's bull shit.
The fact that they use marbles or water flowing in a tube as an analogy to electron flow has always made me laugh even as a kid. One thing has always struck me was people like Tesla and the likes of Eric Dollard and other radio guys have stated that energy flows on the outside of a wire. Knowing what I do today through study it is impossible for an electron to move down a wire at any appreciable speed to be of any use if they move at all. That and the fact that it in no way be transferred through a transformer which keeps then two systems completely isolated. Many have stated that it is free electrons in the wire which makes me laugh even harder. I guess they just pass the purple clown suit around they got from Einstein right! (Sound Familiar Above Unity). Sorry to spoil their parade but the electrons in a wire that form copper doesn't change as it is a dielectric reflector so energy flow on the outside of the wire not inside.
There aren't enough free electrons in a wire to last more than a nanosecond so where does it come from. All metal, well most of them are an amplifier of current when polarized. Since our universe is seething with an abundance of energy (Eather) it supposably is 1000 times smaller then that of the smallest atom. Since Iron has billions of atoms that make up it's structure when polarized all such associated Eather particles flowing randomly within those atoms are thus flowing in the same direction. The purer the iron the easier and more intense the polarization takes place.
Tesla even stated the Eather is like an incompressible gas which I myself have no way of knowing just how to test that out. I like to rely on the basic people that built the foundations for our present society not the complete fools that derailed the entire train with the likes of the purple clown guy Einstein, Hawkins and the like. Heaviside, Lorentz and Gibbins are just as guilty more then likely getting payed off by the likes of the greedy Rothschild's, Rockefeller and JP Morgan to rid all existence of free energy. They were paid to adulterate all of Maxwell's equations severing the ties with free energy. I know you people have heard me rant before but the suppression is real and now a days they are getting so bold as to not hide it any longer like rubbing it in our faces.
One thing I do know is taking two north face electromagnets face to face can raise the overall output of the secondary by a substantial margin. Just how far we can compress the field lines have yet to be seen. What I do know is Figuera raised the pressure to match that of a standard rotating generator producing enough power to supply it self and the load all five times.
Honestly I think people need to reevaluate what has been presented to us in the past and forget about the last 100 years of suppression throwing all that garbage in the trash and starting from the turn if the century 1900. Everything since then has been complete bull shit to the tenth degree with a few exceptions.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Mar 30, 2023 15:22:35 GMT -6
FYI;
If you haven't figured it out by now the cluster fudge right hand rule has been wrong from the start and even the heavy weights got it wrong. This was then perpetuated by the purple clown Einstein movement and others especially the elitist who control all aspects of information.
The cluster fudge right hand rule was introduced by none other then Ben Franklin in the late 1700. He thought current flowed from positive to negative having a 50/50 chance to get it right. Well guess what? he was dead wrong.  This was then picked up by the great Maxwell in the mid 1800 who came up with the corkscrew rule that gives the right magnetic field rotation but unfortunately the wrong direction.  Every single shit physics university around the world still presents this false information even though many know it is wrong. See even heavyweights can get this crap wrong so don't feel bad if you have yourself.
The test I presented in the tech thread concerning the way to wind and test your part G is in fact the correct way the magnetic field rotates and travels around a conductor which is negative to positive. I even tested this out with a one way device, the diode. Test this at your own home with a simple test I have provided and guess what, your one up on Maxwell lol!
PS. The corkscrew rule is still applicable though when you need a good bottle of wine opened!
Regards. Marathonman
|
|
This was then picked up by the great Maxwell in the mid 1800 who came up with the corkscrew rule that gives the right magnetic field rotation but unfortunately the wrong direction. 
Every single shit physics university around the world still presents this false information even though many know it is wrong. See even heavyweights can get this crap wrong so don't feel bad if you have yourself.