|
Post by Marathonman on Sept 12, 2020 12:40:20 GMT -6
Well i sincerely hope everyone is having better luck then i have been. while working on rotor attaching adjustable brush sleeves i busted the only tap i have off in the rotor then busted a screw off in the rotor in the hole i just finished previously. then my motor keeps cutting off so that means my 20 amp electronic motor controller just went bad and i think the motor it self has issues. cheap China shit ! then through all this mess i get sick from getting trapped in the freezing rain the other day and wound up getting sick which is an extreme rarity for me. then from all the rain (5 1/2 inches) apparently the four bay garage roof had a leak and a 12 foot section of sheet rock caved in so the whole garage looks like a leftist Democrat funded Antifa war zone.
oh but wait that is not all, i go out to the garden for the first time in three days and it seems a group of Antifa deer decided to have a party in my garden and destroy most everything they could get a hold of leaving prize winning 8 and 10 lb cantaloupe half eaten all over the place and stomping most everything else. seems the only thing they left alone was the 2 1/2 feet tall prize winning Broccoli, imagine that.
so that leaves me stranded until next week when my supply run ride shows up and i purchase a new supply of hardware and tools.
PS, i am getting a bottle of booze and the 410 from the supply room and i plan on crashing the deer party next week.
Regards. Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Sept 21, 2020 11:40:44 GMT -6
I think the most confusion towards part G in the past on other forums was the fact that for starters people assumed part G was actually the drawing in which was completely false and stated as so in the patent yet completely overlooked repeatedly for years. blind assumptions will get you no where real fast in any situation.
second, was the fact that everyone is taught from a young age that an inductor is a completely static device that just sits in a circuit. while true, it is only half the story of reality that an inductor can and will play an active position in a circuit and assume other roles at the same time.
thirdly, is the fact that inductance, self inductance and inductive reactance seems to play no vital role in their quest of research and attempted replications blindly assuming preconceived ideas about the above mentioned. sadly many assumed the role of attacking defense to cover up their lack of research and knowledge of the three above. i truely feel sorry for people that do not have the ability to see outside the box and personal comfort zone with no ability to visualize the fields interacting and shifting from side to side.
another preconceived idea that the primary cores need be closed which again you would be incorrect. Figuera actually used the reluctance of air to aid his cores in the retention of the magnetic flux as we should all know reluctance of flux is analogous to electrical resistance. in an attempt to close the cores of the primaries you are actually draining off the flux at a higher rate then would be through air as the flux travels through the closed core much faster and less reluctances. what the air reluctance does is slows the change down through the shifting of the fields which allows it to retain (store) most of the flux in the field instead of immediate drainage through a core.
lastly any inductive cores that store into the field will have a potential drop when storing into the field then when the field can no longer store into the field as per the amount of current flow, the current draw will drop to just the I2R wire losses to maintain said field. the current even though present in the circuit is no longer used by the coil to store into the field yet is needed to maintain said field and replace the I2R losses only.
when the current is reduced the stored potential will be release in the same direction it was previously traveling in, the field will then be reduced to accommodate the new current flow. if you have multiple inductors or coils in a series that are not magnetically coupled they will of course be additive in potential just like a series of cells or batteries which if wired properly like Figuera did, can be further used in the system to off set the rising side storing into the magnetic field. always one side increasing, storing into the magnetic field while the other is reducing, releasing it's stored magnetic potential into the system. as soon as the original current flow is stored into the field it is no longer part of the original energy quanta and as such becomes the property of that coil that stored it into the field.
all above info is per the top of his class and VERY successful MIT graduate Sparky Sweet the original inventor of the VTA.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Sept 29, 2020 14:20:28 GMT -6
Video's can be embedded here and no i do not subscribe to anyone on youtube. this is the whole reason of this site to share info. if you feel you do not want to share here any longer then do not let the door hit your back side. it doesn't matter who it is, no one will advertise here to promote their own agenda/site/ channel otherwise i would suggest to get your own site.
have a good day.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 30, 2020 20:05:56 GMT -6
I for one think it is completely wrong for a person to come on this web site, gain knowledge from MY HARD WORK then have the audacity to advertise to their own agenda or channel. if it was not for my complete dedication over the last 7 years to this device all this information would not be available to any one of you.
i freely share what i have learned with no plans to profit from it other then maybe get help to fund a build. other than that i post for the good of humanity NOT my own agenda. i do NOT willingly post what i think might be true or what might work or even to blow smoke up someone ass. all my posts have either had loads of research and bench work to verify or some very, very substantial verification to the validity of the action pertaining to the device.
all people who come here should not only be grateful for my hard work but the opportunity to learn, share and share alike. if you are greedy you do not belong here at all as humanity does NOT NEED YOUR KIND ANY LONGER! and that goes for every sick greedy Government around the world and especially the Builderberg group enslaving humanity.
Regards, ADMIN
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 2, 2020 8:56:35 GMT -6
At least people are finally coming to their senses and realizing part G in the patent is an active inductor not a bunch of resistors or resistor network. i think the biggest problem was the conditioning or malevolent programing of our education system to people over many decades. the patent description is merely that, a description describing a resistive action which is backed up with a drawing in it's elementary manor to aide in the understanding only. Figuera was very cryptive and extremely careful in his word choices and description of the device thus focasing all his attention in the patent on just the rotation of the brush and the resistive action taking place leaving the actual core of part G out of the drawing. you have to think about that for a minute. how on earth would you show inductive reactance in a drawing that people would understand? exactly, it would be darn near impossible with out loads of description and added complexity to the patent so Figuera chose to use "R" in the patent which is nothing more then letting the reader know that there is this much resistance at this point of contact as the brush rotates and nothing more. the sooner you realize part G is in no way shape or form a resistor or resistor network and is actually an active inductor, the chances you will have a successful build just went through the roof. not only that, when you finally realize that the rotating brush is actually rotating on the inductor it self not through a commutator, the better off you will be on your way to the original build that Figuera intended. he did though use a commutator just not in the way everyone thinks he did. the commutator was as described in the patent as a switch to make it continuous if wanted to. this means yes he did use a commutator for the secondary feed back into part G which is rotated by the motor being on the same shaft. Part G the active inductor controller that uses self inductance and Lenz's Law to his advantage to control the current of two feeds 180 degrees out in complete unison. thus falls under the realm of inductive reactance as you just gave DC frequency. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 6, 2020 19:50:48 GMT -6
Our forum has a new member David that joined the ranks. welcome to the forum David and i hope you enjoy all information provided here. after review of information if you have any questions please feel free to ask. again welcome to the Figuera forum. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 13, 2020 17:59:07 GMT -6
I do apologize for such long delays but the prep work involved before and after the owners of the ranch coming home then all the maintenance scheduling is unreal.i am completely tied up this week so hopefully i can work on Figuera this weekend.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 14, 2020 13:21:48 GMT -6
Quick post, so busy. It is really simple in reality when you realize that any increase in self inductance (opposition to current flow)(Lenz's Law) created within the circuit it's self can and will control current flow within part G. it's that simple, add winding, increase inductance, lower current flow. subtract winding's, decrease inductance, raise current flow. so therefore the constant rise and fall of DC has therefore just been given frequency which then falls under inductive reactance. as long as you have ongoing magnetic linking or de-linking (constant brush rotation) to the circuit you will get ongoing self inductance. absolutely no power is wasted through resistance as all potential is either stored in the magnetic field or being released into the system to offset the rising side storing into the magnetic field for the next half cycle. resistors waste potential in the form of heat that is non recoverable yet an active inductor store and releases potential in the most efficient manor on the planet.
Take heed EF and OU, you just might learn something new, one electromagnet is right to left spin direction while the other is left to right spin direction fulfilling the same EMF generation as a standard 4 pole generator. since each one will occupy the secondary one at a time it will indeed have an AC flow output. which by the way is NEVER NEGATIVE, it is positive in the other direction as in alternating never negative.
fools will remain fools unless they take the initiative to open your mind and learn real Faraday Physics. some on the other hand will never get to that point and remain ignorant.
sorry to say...
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 16, 2020 19:31:36 GMT -6
Good news is i get to work on my part G this weekend. i will try to post some pics sunday. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 19, 2020 19:01:40 GMT -6
Unable to get pictures of work because someone decided to twist the variac knob to far and burned out another 12 volt fan and the voltage, amperage meter. ordered new parts and are shipped already. part G is coming along ok with some bumps as always. almost fully assembled with just the new motor to mount. i have someone to help me with the vids as holding the phone and trying to record and explain things are a little difficult. i have a lot recorded so far but i will want the working of part G on the end to substantiate my claims of inductance controlling current flow with direct brush contact. i will keep you posted on outcome. PS visual apparatus is finished waiting part G and power supply.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 28, 2020 21:06:38 GMT -6
It is a hard pill to swallow that the ranch comes first. i have been so involved with the ranch that i had to put my foot down and say enough is enough. free energy is the facts of life. all one needs to do just like Tesla and figure out how to do it. Figuera figured out how to do it for us and i have laid it out for all to see. i am so sad to not have the device finished you have no idea. i will succeed in getting the info to you as i to will succeed.
hang in there folks it will happen.
Regards. Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Oct 31, 2020 9:07:32 GMT -6
Everything is fine with new breakout boards but i just do not have the time right now for anything but the ranch. many repairs that were not performed over the last 15 to 20 years has be so busy and completely frustrated over not being able to finish part G. that and preparing for winter which is soon with us. had ice storm a few days ago.
Referring to the build it seems people think part G's connections are ran through a commutator in which you would be incorrect. if you reread Figuera and Buforn patents paying very close attention to the wording you will realize that neither of the two mention a commutator throughout the whole patents except near the end with the statements " using a switch to make it continuous if wanted to" and "using a motor to rotate the brush and the switch" (FACTS). it never states the previous connections are ran through a commutator as that is just the drawing which is not only in it's elementary manor to facilitate the comprehension of the device but just used to describe the function of part G's resistance "ONLY". also you must consider that since Zeiss, or rather Abby of Zeiss built the first Vaiac with a roller brush in Germany and most likely Figuera's part G, it would be very safe to say Figuera's part G was built with very similar aspects of that Variac.
the drawing supplied with Figuera's patent was very, very secretive and only exposed enough information to get the patent yet Buforn in his haste to repatent and differentiate his patent from Figuera's, he exposed more info then did Figuera showing the roller brush. even though it is just a drawing it still substantiates the use of the roller brush and direct brush to winding contact. the use of the commutator was used for the secondary feed back into the active inductor controller and the reason for that is part G controls the amount of current flowing through the device as does the saturation of the closed core. remember part G becomes the power supply once the starting is remove so since it is the focal point of the system it is very safe to say the secondary feed back has to flow through the shaft mounted commutator to part G.
part G is basically a large rector in the sense that it reacts to the changing DC current fluctuations in the same manor as would AC yet with DC since it is NOT reversing it's current flow it is many, many times more efficient then that of AC. remember that primaries are just reduced to get the sweeping action just clearing the secondary only then back to full potential as the other is reduced. at NO time is the primaries reversing it's polarity as that would take way, way to much potential and time to perform. Figuera used larger wire around part G to reduce resistance of the wire since all resistance is wasteful through the form of heat and is NON RECOVERABLE.
Figuera figured out that with a positive rotating brush he could split the reactor in two at the brush allowing him to control two feeds in the opposite manor of one increasing and the other decreasing using a purely inductive device to control current flow of those two feeds. since part G has basically zero resistance as does the primaries he is using a purely reactive device to control current flow in the most efficient manor on the planet.
it is really simple when you boil it down to the basic functions, he with his part G active inductor controller used self inductance not current change to control current flow. with both sides of the brush winding count actively changing as the brush rotates he essentially is changing the amount of inductance of both side being split into two active inductors at the brush. you must remember that according to Faraday in 1831, "Any increase or decrease of flux will induce an EMF" and since it was created within the circuit it self, "IT" according to the Lenz Law will oppose the original current flow that created it in the first place.
so the final outcome is a continuous rise and fall of inductance and current flow through part G which then has frequency, which then falls under inductive reactance as it is stated "any current change falls under inductive reactance.
if you people are looking for resistors or resistor network that would not be on this floor or this device. sorry charley, resistance is for kids as is the Physics behind it if you believe the device has resistors.
Happy building friends. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Nov 6, 2020 19:03:04 GMT -6
Not much to report but thought i should at least post where i am at. i finally figured out that my aluminum all thread was binding the motor up just slightly so i redrilled the mounting holes larger in which the motor will self right into the shaft hole then i will tighten. did a dry run with the positive brush in place and it was very, very smooth. since the inductor face is ground and polished flat the brush just slid like it was on glass. i would suggest this to all replicators that are doing direct brush contact as did the original replicator suggested.
new amp volt meter is slightly larger then the old one so a little modification is at hand and the new fan will be put into place this weekend. i am finally able to see light and i am planning on testing with a week if everything goes well. still have a slight wobble in the slip rings so i will take a piece of sand paper on a stick to fix it.
PS; love the thumbs down someone gave me on my new video on SPI Shift Registers, must have been from OU, EF or an energy affiliated retard. Happy building. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Nov 10, 2020 10:28:57 GMT -6
Problems with people is that when results start happening they get greedy and start hording their results with visions of getting rich. i have seen it happen over the years of my Figuera investigation and other devices. this is why i post all my information on the Figuera device as i am not greedy nor will i ever be. this is why i exposed the fool on OU as he thought he was going to patent part G because it in it self produced more out then it took to feed it. when you store into the magnetic field then release it will of course be higher potential from the combined potentials.
if humanity is going to survive we need to share and share alike. if it is not good for the whole then it is not good for the one. i have shared for the last 6 years and have no plans to stop. i am again looking for a suitable motor that is all as the ones i have purchased are not up to the task at hand.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
carlo
New Member
Posts: 18
|
Post by carlo on Nov 12, 2020 7:35:46 GMT -6
12/11/2020 era covid good morning marathonman greetings to builders figuera I'm back on the site talking to you and possibly exchanging experience on the figuera generator. There are many things that have not yet arrived one in particular figuera had a 20 hp engine running as a constant load connected to the generator so the generator was calibrated for that power to maintain a fidbaak response here I wonder what to base on to put the load because if without load as or verified it does not work. another thing is the tuning of the system which values consider the primaries with part g as mh of the primaries mounted with the secondaries or detached or not coupled. What to consider as a secondary baak feed if the generator works only with the load works accordingly. if the system does not load which parameters to check. Thank you for the answers that you can give me if possible.
greetings to all carlo Italy builders
|
|