|
Post by Marathonman on Mar 22, 2021 13:36:34 GMT -6
I posted the link to the Per Loop Inductance calc tool in the electronic thread so i will post it here also. Per Loop Inductance
use this too and add your core wire loop dimensions to get your total inductance needed for your build. someone like creasysee should of used this calc tool to dial in the proper inductance as well as myself from the start. i am glade i found it and it does seem to be correct. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Apr 15, 2021 6:50:03 GMT -6
Yes i am working on the inductance video today since it is raining here, i will post it shorty but be aware it is using the variac core i just purchased as my C core needs redone from epoxy adherence failure.
Regars, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Apr 18, 2021 6:56:54 GMT -6
Working on video today and hopefully post it by the end of the day. seems through all this fake covid BS there is a shortage of 805 smd diodes. i am having trouble finding proper spected diode for my electronic switching. what a real mess the power elite has done to this world.
EDIT; Video is being processed and will be uploaded to youtube shortly.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Apr 29, 2021 7:21:24 GMT -6
I sure everyone enjoyed the video. i even did it in one take all 6 video's then combined as one. if people still have trouble with certain areas i can explain further, just ask. i am looking for a way to not rewind my core and i think i can get epoxy under the winding's then clamp and set for a week to totally cure out and avoid separation.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on May 1, 2021 7:27:38 GMT -6
Found some really valuable information concerning the winding of your primaries and the length at which you should consider when designing and fabricating. it coincides exactly what i have been saying of which the primaries need to be at least 2 to 1 ratio at minimum.
the info was found in a early 1900 publication on magnetism and electromagnets. i will post shortly the information i have acquired, stay tuned on tech info.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on May 4, 2021 19:20:02 GMT -6
Does anyone including the visitors actually know how a standard rotating generator works ? i mean this in a non derogatory manor of questioning of course. no power is inputted into the device at all yet it creates massive amount of power. the motor is used to create rotational motion through the fields and maintain frequency through that rotation. at NO time is there ever any power added to the device exciting side to produce power in the generating output side. they are essentially two separate systems and as such used approximately 10 to 15 % of it's output to feed back to the exciting side, to produce more output until the device is at full running conditions. once the pressure in the exciting side is built up to running conditions, the primary electromagnets cease to become a load as they are no longer storing into the magnetic field. they then are reduced in draw to just the I2R losses (resistance) of the wire and the current flows right through it as if it were a straight piece of wire. as long as the exciting side can maintain the exciting pressure in the exciting system to maintain the field needed for the output side of the system, it will maintain it self and the load. if not for the Lenz Law, the device would be OU except for the fact that there is massive attraction and repulsion of the rotor as current is produced and used in the output. ask yourself "WHY?" are these forces present and what does it do to cause the attraction and repulsion. as the current is drawn from the secondary coil the conductor produces a magnetic field thus being in such close proximity to each other, the magnetic field interacts with the surrounding coils and produces an EMF and another magnetic field in the reverse direction. this field created approaches the stator with an opposing field and an attraction field as it leaves the stator. this action causes the generator to bog down as the electricity is drawn from the output thus causing the motor use more fuel to maintain the rotational speed. this is the LENZ LAW hard at work which modern day Einsteinian Physics say can not be avoided. BS ! it takes ruffly 150 % of power to get 90 something % out of the device yet at NO TIME is there EVER any potential input into the device. the entire generating side maintains it self and the load with the 10 to 15 % feed back. so if the motor is used for rotation only then how can this device produce power and self excite in the process. because modern day BS Physics says there is no such thing as perpetual motion or free energy yet the Figuera device and the generating part of a standard generator does just that, SELF SUSTAIN. please start asking questions at all times, questioning the status quo that says there is not such thing as free energy or perpetual motion. Oh, by the way, the very ground you stand on has been spinning for billions of years and will continue for billions more. still believe there is no such thing as perpetual motion?, well you must not live on earth then. Ha, Ha, Ha! QUESTION EVERYTHING THEY SAY ! Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on May 15, 2021 15:50:39 GMT -6
I am trying to eliminate the bobbin in my electromagnets because of the wasted induction capability but doing some brings up other issues in winding the electromagnets with the capability of my winder and the weight of the cores. this is the reason for rounding my corners of the cores, use less wire and the ease of winding.
the first few winding's are the most important so in my experiences and in information gathering, the closer the winding's to the core the better off i will be. the issue of sectional wind will present a few more issues but after long and hard thinking/reasoning i think the benefits out weigh the difficulties in winding. yes i am going to use smaller diameter wire, yet still parallel/series them to attain my goal and still keep the resistance, self inductances low.
so on that note i have new bobbin material coming that with a new design of the bobbin ends allowing me to direct wind on the core.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on May 19, 2021 19:10:18 GMT -6
I am rewinding the primaries to reflect the loss in inductance from reluctance of the air gap i have overlooked. the new primary will account for this as well as the series parallel winding directly on the core it self.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on May 22, 2021 14:59:39 GMT -6
Any change to the magnetic environment of a coil of wire (a conductor) will cause a voltage (emf) to be induced in the coil. And if the coil (conductor circuit) is closed, current will flow.
The "CAUSE" of the change in magnetic environment Absolutely does not matter, it could be caused by #1 changing the magnetic field strength, #2 by moving the magnet towards and away from the coil, #3 by moving the coil into and out of the magnetic field, #4 by rotating the coil relative to the magnetic field or #5 increasing and decreasing the area of circuit. As long as there is relative motion between the magnetic field and the coil, a voltage will be induced so long as it is a closed system.
the first example is of course the Figuera device with alternating the DC current from high to low which then changes the magnetic field strength, the later example are of course your standard generator. the 5th example is of course the active inductor controller. all that is required is "SOME" type of movement according to Faraday to create EMF.
in the Figuera example it is of course much, much easier to move the weightless, massless field back and forth then it is to deal with adverse effects of the Lenz Law of the standard rotating generator repulsion and attraction of the massive hunk of Iron rotor to stator.
"As per Tom Bearden"
The scalar part of Maxwell's quaternion interaction, that remains when the vector part of the resultant is zero, is magic indeed. that is the magic unified field portion that everyone has been seeking for decades and decades! It was there at the beginning. *Then we inexplicably threw it away!* (*see below*) But to return to our vector/quaternion examples. Note also that the two vectors v1= ai + bj + ck, v2 = -ai - bj - ck (4-6) sum to zero vectorially when added, such that v1 + v2 = 0 (4-7) However, quaternions may behave quite differently, even under addition. For example, the two quaternions q1 = w + ai + bj + ck, q2 =w - ai -bj - ck (4-8) sum their vector parts to a vector zero resultant, but do not sum to a scalar zero as well. Instead, they sum to q1 + q2 = 2w (4-9) As can be seen, quaternions which have the same vector parts as vectors, do not necessarily yield a complete zero when the vector parts sum to zero. And when two vectors multiply to provide a zero vector resultant, corresponding quaternions may yield a scalar term that is equal to the product of the magnitudes of the two vectors. In this way, the quaternion approach can capture the stress of the medium, induced by opposing or multiplying vectors.
Read "Heaviside's Mutilation of Maxwell's Theory"
in other words the twin opposing magnetic fields of the Figuera device sum naturally to zero but unbeknownst to everyone the scalar portions equal to the product of the magnitudes of the two vectors or precisely square of the two scalar product. therefore increasing one electromagnet and decreasing the other simultaneously naturally align the scalar products of both electric fields yet magnetically sum to zero.
(*) WE did not throw it away, it was intentionally omitted to erase all traces of free energy by J.P.Morgan, Rothschild's, Rochefeller's and the like. this intention was paid to greedy Heaviside, Lorentz, Gibbins and friends then the clown Einstein was put into place as a savior when in reality was a buffoon that did not even know what E=MC2 ment. all work was plagiarized and orchestrated by the Elites not Einstein, to halted all advancements of Science and Physics as we know it, throwing Aether and free energy in the trash pile.
The Electron has "NEVER" been proven and still remains a theory to THIS DAY (a bad one at that) even J.J Thompson himself later admitted he was probably wrong. since copper, aluminum and the like are "IN FACT" Dielectric Reflectors, they can not as such have moving so called free electrons through them. the fluid like Aether flows on the outside of the wire not through it as presently taught. excellent work presented by Eric Dollard on this subject.
The real Unified Field Theory was actually and inadvertently presented by Maxwell himself in his quaternion equations not the buffoon Einstein who was just a clown puppet to keep people occupied while the real cover up took place by the Elites ridding all traces of real free energy.
EDIT; i could be misunderstanding the scalar portion but i do not think so. even if this is true it is still applicable to vector fields as per Bearden and thus still a square of the two vector fields or multiplication of, which still add to Four times as much as one field alone.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Jun 2, 2021 7:39:54 GMT -6
Received Acrylic squares today so i will be assembling the new primaries utilizing direct winding on the core and also the parallel winding technique. i have to build a second carrier for one half of the core to support the weight of the core. it of course will be in conjunction with my winder on the same horizontal plane.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Jun 5, 2021 7:56:28 GMT -6
Working on the new carrier to support the winding directly on the core this weekend and will commence rewinding the primaries with sectional winding technique.
i am also building a mechanical version of the Figuera device using opposing magnets. i have purchased 1"x 1" magnets and attached two together then set them opposing locked together 1 inch apart. i will then jog it back and forth over a fixed coil using the AC motor i had purchased earlier this year using the AC output to feed back to the motor. if my general calculations are correct, i will attain 100 to 150 watts out from the pressure i have attained in the opposing fashion. i will have two opposing assemblies moving out while the other two are moving in for a complete balance of the overall assembly as not to burden the motor to much.
i used PVC parts, epoxy and what ever else i had to assemble them in which the end result is just great. the end result will be a proof of concept that the Figuera device switched in this fashion DOES do what he claimed it does.i will post pics of the assembly later today.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Jun 6, 2021 8:47:12 GMT -6
Here are the mechanical assemblies i am working on along with everything else which is six or seven projects. these assemblies are two 1x1 magnets end to end then set opposing to another two. this will be the mechanical, mechanical version and as such will be set in an opposing rotation . what this means is when one assembly is moving outward another assembly is moving outward also thus the end result is two assembly moving outward and two moving inward for a total of four assemblies in a balanced scenario. these will be attached to a flywheel with an off set pin to jog the assemblies back and fourth over the coil which will be permanently set in between the opposing magnets. i did not measure the pressure between them but my estimates are a few pounds per square inch which will net between 100 and 150 watts of power each. to get 50 watts equal to .74 lbs of pressure, 100 watts requiring 1.48 lbs and 150 watts requiring 2.22 lbs per square inch. this of course will just be to appease the foolish individuals that are still stuck on the old power elite control system taught in present universities of no such thing as free energy/perpetual motion and the fake closed symmetrical second laws of thermal dynamics not asymmetrical. this law has been broken many times and as such is seriously flawed to say the least as well as most all of present day Physics which was set in place on purpose of control by J.P. Morgan and friends. please remember the Rothschild's created the controlling educational system we see today which is pushing the fake narrative sidetracking real Physics and Science.. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by greywolf47 on Jun 6, 2021 18:54:45 GMT -6
It is quite amazing at the amount of mind control the cabal has on people these days. i posted Creasysee's video of his electronic part G on the Arduino site. what happened is they said the part G was not working just some control lights blinking. i immediately started laughing at them and the people on OU that are so called University educated. i had to tell them the lights are not control lights as they are the lights on the outputs which are being controlled by inductive reactance. the amount of cabal mind control is unbelievable as none of them has the ability to think outside the box, thinking what they have been taught is the only way and that free energy is impossible. this was the doing of J.P.Morgan in his rampage to rid the world of Tesla and the free energy equations from the face of the earth changing every single test book in the U.S. (FACT) here lies the problem, most people do not understand the working parameters of a generator and that a standard generator would be Over unity or self sustaining if not for the cogging effect or reverse torque if you will, placed upon the rotor. the amount of power used to combat this reverse torque is unbelievably large which renders the generator massively inefficient. if the reverse torque was removed then a massive motor would not be required to turn it. another thing is what people do not understand is the feed back into the system is stupidly small compared to the output. a standard generator uses only around 10% of the output to be feed back to the AVR which regulates the potential to the exciters or primaries if you will. once they are at working "PRESSURES", as in magnetic field intensity and line current between the AVR and the primaries, the magnetic fields can easily be maintained. current (pressure) in this line creates a certain amount of magnetic field intensity between the north and south electromagnet. if the draw is increased the resistance on the output circuit drops allowing more current to flow which then sends more current to the AVR increasing the feed pressure of the primaries which in turn increase the intensity of the magnetic fields. once the system equalizes the amount of potential needed to excite the primaries reduces to just the IR2 losses with the rest just passing by as if it were a straight piece of wire. the pressure to maintain the magnetic fields is still in the exciting line between the AVR and the primaries as this is still needed to maintain the magnetic fields just not being directly used. what people fail to realize is we are dealing with pressure regulated systems. just because they are electrically driven does not mean we are not dealing with pressure. electricity is Eather pressure and must be at the proper pressures to maintain the output of man's generating systems. the only time the draw on the primaries are increased is when the load on the external system is increased. after equalization the primary draw is then reduced to just the IR2 losses again with the rest of the pressure passing right on by yet needed to maintain the magnetic field intensity. in the Figuera device the very same scenario is taking place except the AVR has been replaced with Part G which regulated the current going to the exciters/primaries. part G also stores and releases potential which is used to maintain or preserve the exciting potential (Pressure) in the form of a magnetic field. this is what allows the device to self run understanding the mechanism of generation and the realization of the three electromagnet core pattern of generation will aide in the advancement of your reproduction of this device as both use the same mechanism of generation. you have to realize Figuera already figured out how to build a self running device with not one but two working devices presented to the patent office. just because your dogma teachings say it isn't so doesn't change these facts that Figuera found the key to self sustainment. it is not Figuera's fault replicators failed in their attempts to replicate, it just means you have something wrong with your build. this is why Internet sites like this one are here so interested and like minded people can come together to replicate this device without all the dogma taught ney sayers screaming it can't be done.
|
|
|
Post by greywolf47 on Jun 6, 2021 19:08:10 GMT -6
Information on this thread brought to mind an interesting train of reasoning. If a generator as conventionally built was made with an insulator as the core for the stator windings and permanant magnets were used in the armature, how much reduction in drag would be created due to NOT having opposing magnets resisting each other. Even if the output was reduced by not having a steel core, the output would be about 60 percent but the power required to turn the generator would be only about 10 percent of normal. Anyone have any thoughts or bench testing of this theory??
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Jun 7, 2021 6:56:13 GMT -6
Hello greywolf47 and welcome to the forum.
I personally do not have the time since i am on a working ranch and on top of that i have around seven projects going at once. so it seems i will leave that for others to test.
interesting subject though and i think no one realizes just how much power is needed to turn the standard generator when pulling current from said output. the Lenz law causing the repulsion and attraction of the rotor as it approaches and leave the stator are unbelievable. it take 150 % power to get 90 something out. very say indeed. there is a patent that i remember seeing where the researcher turned the magnets 90 degrees from normal and the attraction was substantially reduced. it has been a while but i am sure i can find it. could possibly be it's own thread though if pursued.
Regards,
|
|