Post by Marathonman on Sept 26, 2019 7:49:39 GMT -6
*Physics* Exactly as i have stated multiple times, to much inductance on the primary like when one length of wire is used will slow the reaction time down to far and the primary can not react fast enough to the changes of current from part G. one winding length increases the time constant of the primaries and since part G is a single layer they will be out of sink with each other and the system will not operate properly. do you honestly think i would mislead anyone purposely? not in a million years my friend. we are here to help Humanity not destroy it. more evidence to support my cause. it still kills me in laughter why some clown thought 63.2 percent is the end of time constant, basically it works within the ball park value. this is why the primaries are wound specifically as electromagnets ignoring present day teachings that resistance controls current flow. one wire length will increase the resistance and inductance thus increasing the time constant of the circuit. now maybe people will listen to the message given.
very good find Peter, well done and thanks for posting it here.
Last Edit: Sept 27, 2019 11:50:01 GMT -6 by Marathonman
Post by Marathonman on Sept 27, 2019 11:42:07 GMT -6
Good news, thanks to a small *donation* *(Thank You)* i was able to purchase a new slip ring for my brush holder rotor. so when it gets in next week i will begin to reassemble part G then test some time after that. the old one had to be cut off because it was warped and resigned on the shaft, DUH ! i was also able to purchase for a very cheap price on ebay a very nice breadboard so i can begin testing the code for the electronic switching of part G. even though i am working on the mechanical version i can still help in the electronic version to jump start that area. i have the help of the Arduino forum to streamline the ISP coding which when finished will be presented to the public to build an electronic version of part G as does two other builders in the electronic section.
again thank you for the donation, i can now make some forward progress in the mechanical and electronic version thus posting pics of my progress.
Post by Marathonman on Sept 30, 2019 9:43:21 GMT -6
As you might have noticed i have changed the thread titles to reflect the thread more appropriately and descriptively. since we are working on the 1908 version the title should reflect this information and as such they do now. I thank you all for being here as you are the reason i am here in the first place to share my knowledge.
Freedom; Freedom is everywhere, within one's state of mind. people unconsciously seem to want their liberties and rights taken away to be controlled. i am here to awaken one's awareness to such freedom and independence from Corporate control. i have always questioned authority as they do not have my best interest at stake, they have theirs at stake only. and you wonder why i pursue this device so diligently----welcome to the revolution ! your welcome. Regards, Marathonman
Post by Marathonman on Oct 1, 2019 19:58:36 GMT -6
I was just surfing the web and came across sparkfun web site. i found some copper tape that is 3 mill thick by 2 inches wide with sticky back. seams to be some good stuff and i would love to wind a primary with this stuff to see what kind of a field i could get. 3 parallel groups of about 20 winds each would bring the ohms down to almost zero and still be only 60 mill plus the backing thickness so say ruffly 70 mill. hell that is equal to about 1 loop of 13 aug wire. i found thicker stuff but it is way more expensive yet i sure would love to try it to see the results.
On line Metals carries bare copper foil link. On Line Metals. it is only .01 but at two inches wide and 100 feet long. at .01 that is 30 awg yet = to 200, 30 awg wires = 28 amp capability. even if you needed a lot more winds hell at .01 thickness it doesn't add up very fast. with the sticky back in the previous post would still be a viable option. staying at 2 to 1 ratio the two inch foil is something to think about.
McMaster-Carr caries as well but yikes what a price for .01 and up.
Post by Marathonman on Oct 2, 2019 19:07:49 GMT -6
Ah, i love to hear those words....."less resistance"....= less losses in the system. why ? because part G controls the current flow NOT the primaries. so it is all about part G telling the primaries, Hey primary, just do what you are suppose to do being electromagnets and let me handle the current thingy. ok part G just tell my builder that.
just received my new slip rings today. the reason i say slip rings is they came in a pack of three on ebay. so now if i screw up again i have back up. the only thing is they are a millimeter to small which i know before i bought them. so now i need to figure out how to hone them out to a snug fit on the shaft without getting it out of round again like the last one i did. one thing though i i failed to realize how tall they really are which blocks my hollow shaft wire hole. so i will have to literally cut them in half after the honing which is just fine as i only need one slip ring. the rings are actually smaller diameter and thicker on these then the old ones were so they will last a lot longer even after resurfacing after a year of use.
Post by Marathonman on Oct 6, 2019 12:12:36 GMT -6
"Without freedom of thought there can be no such thing as wisdom and no such thing as public liberty without freedom of speech." this directly relates to out present day teaching system. a student or person is not allowed the freedom of thought therefore no wisdom is gained thus our public liberties and freedom of speech is a complete fallacy. the total lie perpetrated on the world that America the free is actually a Corporate controlled system training you how to follow orders not your own thoughts guided by our lovely bought and paid for puppet Governments instilling guidelines of control.
When Benjamin Franklin made his conjecture regarding the direction of charge flow (from the smooth wax to the rough wool), he set a precedent for electrical notation that exists to this day, despite the fact that we know electrons are the constituent units of charge, and that they are displaced from the wool to the wax—not from the wax to the wool—when those two substances are rubbed together. This is why electrons are said to have a negative charge: because Franklin assumed electric charge moved in the opposite direction that it actually does, and so objects he called “negative” (representing a deficiency of charge) actually have a surplus of electrons.
By the time the true direction of electron flow was discovered, the nomenclature of “positive” and “negative” had already been so well established in the scientific community that no effort was made to change it, although calling electrons “positive” would make more sense in referring to “excess” charge. You see, the terms “positive” and “negative” are human inventions, and as such have no absolute meaning beyond our own conventions of language and scientific description. Franklin could have just as easily referred to a surplus of charge as “black” and a deficiency as “white,” in which case scientists would speak of electrons having a “white” charge (assuming the same incorrect conjecture of charge position between wax and wool).
He also discovered that only one of these charges can move while the other is stationary. He didn't know which so he made a guess and said the current flow from + to - which he had a 50/50 chance and got it wrong. Then in 1900, J.J. Thompson discovered an electron and proved electrons are negative and that they flow to a positive charge. In reality, - flow to + Physicists use: - flow to + Engineeers use: + flow to -.
Why engineers use a wrong assumption? Because during 1900's they didn't change their textbooks. So we are stuck with a wrong convection current.
However, because we tend to associate the word “positive” with “surplus” and “negative” with “deficiency,” the standard label for electron charge does seem backward. Because of this, many engineers decided to retain the old concept of electricity with “positive” referring to a surplus of charge, and label charge flow (current) accordingly. This became known as conventional flow notation:
yes i do agree that the pressure flow is from - to + but i personally do not believe there is such a thing as positive or negative charged particles anywhere in our universe as i do believe in a few things Ken Wheeler says and that is Eather pressure modalities. the so called negative is actual charging to a higher pressure potential creating heat and positive is radiative discharging to less pressure which is radiated to cold in an never ending cycle. the system remains as is because it instills doubt and confusion which is what the elite want
the funny part about the whole electron thing is J.J. Thompson never proved it existed and is only a theory just like the BS from Einstein. they remain to this day "A THEORY" which has literally destroyed science and Physics advancements to this day. i will give credit were credit is due as Thompson was a very intelligent person which is not the case for Einstein as he was a puppet to stop all advancements on purpose fore which the rich bankers paid for with their illegal money printing presses. the Figuera device and many others like it are not suppose to work according to present day science and physics yet they do so these should be the tell tail red flag signs for a researcher to question the supposedly "Authorities" on the subject matter they post as real workings of our magnetic and electric systems. testing yourselves is the only way you will learn the truth that we have been lied to for well over 100 years and have been controlled like puppets for 6,000 years.
it has been independently proven that our world is in a natural warming cycle that will happen if we are here or not but the facts that Corporate and Governmental entities are polluting out environment at an unprecedented rate will literally kill everything on this planet if we do not get away from so called fossil fuels, plastics and the like. sitting idly by as a guest watching or as a human being on this planet watching other people attempt to save potentially millions of lives is absolutely insane and gutless in my book. a few people on this planet can not save the world, that will take the combined effort of EVERYONE if we are to survive the next hundred years. the rich and powerful elite have some really horrific things planed for the general population in the very near future to thin down the populations to a manageable state in their eyes. why? to control us any which way they can, all you have to do is open you eyes to the world events and see the reality.
building this device and others like this will take their rein of control away giving it back to the people where it belonged in the first place. these are not theories, these are facts so stop your blindness towards them and get informed right now.