|
Post by Marathonman on Jan 21, 2022 14:25:30 GMT -6
I am in the process of moving again but this time it is my own place. i am almost complete with the house remodel where i presently reside and look forward to having my own place again. then after that i will be looking for my own house to remodel like a fixer upper.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Feb 8, 2022 15:53:45 GMT -6
Here is a little tid bit to get your brain nice and fogged up.
the revolution of the Figuera device is at 3600 RPM or 60 Hz in the US which equates to 16.666 ms per revolution. Lets say i have 150 winds on my part G either electronic or mechanical switching. you can not divide 16.666 ms by 150 to get the on time because the end winding's are on for 5 times longer then the ones in the middle. so subtracting those two end winds and calculating them with additional time we are left with 148 winds. now add the on time for the ends 2x5 = 10. so 148 + 10 = 158.
now divide 16.666 by 158 you get .105481 ms or 105481 us.
148 winds x .105481 ms = 15.6111 ms
2 end winds @ 5 times longer = 10 x .105481 = 1.05481 ms
Total- 15.6111 ms + 1.05481 ms = 16.66591 ms = 1 revolution of either the brush or electronic switching on time. of course i dropped the long numbers to the right going only five digits.
so the moral of the post is "IF" i had 150 winding's on part G each winding or taps in electronic switching will be on for .105481 ms or 105481 Microseconds with the ends on for .527495 ms or 527495 Microseconds each or both at 1.05481 ms .
this is the only way i could get the time right by doing it this way. now converting this above to electronic switching shift registers is another feet i am going to tackle in that thread.
Regards. Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Feb 13, 2022 17:38:17 GMT -6
Just an FTI shout out to all that still do not believe this device can do what the patent says. according to Faraday and Maxwell, any change in the magnetic state (Increase or Decrease) of space near or within a secondary Coil produces an induced current in the wire. this is exactly what is taking place in the Figuera device irregardless if you oppose this or or not. each primary occupies the secondary in a sweeping motion from side to side. each one having a reverse field rotation just like a standard generator N/S S/N fields. it's that simple yet elusive in production at this time. the actual device is simple as it's operation yet I have not achieved self sustainment yet. but i will!.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Apr 15, 2022 12:57:29 GMT -6
I don't have much to say just that I am slowly recovering from my near death experience. My walk today I felt wonderful as the organic mix I take is allowing my body to heal it self. I actually had goose bumps today which is good. The mix I take is Moringa, Chia seeds, Hemp seeds, Turmeric, and Flax seeds. do yourself and your body a favor and take these natural substances.
See Ya soon.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Apr 16, 2022 12:04:30 GMT -6
Now that I am getting well again and move again I will be setting up shop. the test PCB board for the high side drivers are complete and I will be sending them in for manufacturing. upon completion of the test board data I will then move forward on the final 16 channel high side switching PCB boards. this will complete the switching of the electronic side of the Figuera device having NO moving parts what so ever. I am very excited and I know it has been a long time over due but good things come to those who wait.
The unfortunate thing about the FIguera device is every one else has stopped research or replication and yes things are slow on this site. I do wish there were other replicators present but it is what it is.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Apr 16, 2022 13:57:35 GMT -6
While still work in progress I still am amazed at the amount of cabal minions that oppose all notions of free energy even though our world that has been spinning in a perpetual motion machine for billions of years unabated. sorry minion but there is not a big guy in space spinning the earth or the universe for that matter.
Take a magnet or electromagnet physically moving it into a loop in this direction (>) toward a loop of wire (i) shown here with just a line viewing sideways . if the motion of the magnetic field is (>) into the wire (i) then the induced according to physics will be (<) in this direction. meaning the electric field has an induction in this direction (<) which oppose what created it.
now with the second electromagnet placed on the opposite side switched in the opposite fashion which would be (>) in this direction. this causes the induced or electric field to be in this direction (<) to maintain the magnetic field and oppose what created it in the first place. so by placing an exact copy of the electromagnet on the opposite side of the previous electromagnet you will have two electric fields in the same direction being (<<) which support each other giving an electric field the square of the two fields.
in this process of the two exact electromagnets place facing each other you will have not only a field compression yet also have two magnetic field opposing one another in opposite spin direction. when shifted from side to side each electromagnet (having opposite spin direction) occupy the secondary one at a time fulfilling the same requirements as a standard four pole generator yet with only two north face poles.
contrary to belief the Figuera device does not violate not one physics law. I am sorry Minions but the notion of free energy is not a law violation and even then such other laws are completely flawed as in completely like idiot Einstein's relativity BS. you have been duped into thinking there is no such thing as free energy and as such it is YOUR PROBLEM NOT MINE. there is no amount of minionism in this world that can change the fact that Figuera had 5 patents all working models taken and verified to the patent office.
just because I myself am having some problems does not take away from the fact that "YES" there were (5) F-in working patents verified. so in my opinion only a simple minded minion fool would ignore such factual information. but as I have stated that is YOUR PROBLEM NOT MINE.
even though some of our Physics laws are flawed according to what we have now the Figuera device will work as I have stated.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Apr 22, 2022 8:59:35 GMT -6
I have been working on an alternative to my present brush implementation on my rotor brush holder. at around 2,500 to 3,000 rpm I am getting brush lift off which is not good. the original replicator used a spring tension system using some type of springy metal tp apply pressure to the brush. regular brushes I am using the spring is way to weak and lifts off. so far this is my only problem with the rotor.
The C transformer will be rewound using a high temp machinable epoxy. this time I am sure I will get it right.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on May 24, 2022 11:46:56 GMT -6
Just a general discussion concerning part G.
In order for the inductance to be ongoing (IE Current control) (AKA Lenz Law) there has to be constant ongoing increase and decrease of the induction which is opposition to the original current flow. that means the constant addition and subtraction of winding's on the core and the fact that each side has to be in complete unison in order for this to work. the compression between the two electromagnets has to be maintained at all times or induction will cease. if one was to study part G as much as I have then you would of came to the same conclusions as I have.
Part G has to be closed core in order to preserve the magnetic fields of both sides of the inductor being split in two at the brush. each side increases or decreases in complete unison as the brush rotates. you can not expect a device to be over unity or remain working if the exciting side of the system is wasted and have to constantly replenish the exciting potential. this will never happen so Figuera used a closed core inductor to preserve the magnetic field using it to store and release the magnetic fields at the proper times aiding the opposite side of the system. one side stores and the other releases at the same time and vise verse constantly.
this CAN NOT be done with a resistive network thus will have to constantly furnish the exciting potential from the output. this will not happen in a million years so one has to think outside the box coming up with ways to preserve the exciting potential, "AKA" Active Inductor Controller.
People need to start thinking this way, (ie ways to preserve the exciting potential), otherwise their devices will never be self sustaining. remember electricity is pressure gradients and flows from high pressure to low pressure, South charges into counterspace and North discharges into space. it does take a finite amount of time to build up this pressure in the exciting side of the system and once it is built up and maintained you can thus constantly excite another circuit continuously from that point on. this is just like a standard generator that builds up the exciting side pressure acting on a secondary system to produce energy. once the exciting side is up too working pressure they system only needs to replace the losses occurred. the only time the system draws considerably more current is when the load on the secondary system is increased then again reaching equilibrium dropping the actual exciting potential draw to just the losses which include the ohmic losses inherent in all mans systems. the rest of the exciting potential (IE.. Pressure) passes right through the coil like it was not even there yet needed to maintain the exciting side system pressure to maintain the magnetic fields. it is like it is being used to maintain the magnetic field yet not actually being used by the system so no draw occurres on the secondary feedback.
I hope you people can understand this explanation, if not please feel free to ask me to clarify. I try to word things in different ways so the majority can hopefully understand the implication.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 5, 2022 13:25:05 GMT -6
I am really wondering it man really understands electricity at all. Take for instance a motor, when you start it it obviously draws a lot of energy to get the motor turning and up to speed. The magnetic and electric field have to be created in a finite time. When the motor is at running speed the current draw is reduced. lets say we turn the motor off letting it come to a full stop. then a few seconds later you start the motor again but this time the motor only takes 1/2 the wattage to get to running conditions.....WHY?
Because in the real world once a polarization takes place and an electric field and magnetic is formed the window from counterspace into space stays open for a while longer not reacting as fast as a magnetic field does in space. It allows the electric field to continue to flow in while the window slowly closes and is why the motor only took 1/2 the wattage the second time. This can be verified by anyone and doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out.
When the Figuera device opposing field are formed and shifted back and forth they create two electric field. Since one is increasing and the other decreasing the two fields are unified into one field with their polarization in the same direction thus acting as one unified electric field. This is irregardless of the secondaries presence or not. Both fields combined equal the total output of the secondary. The magnetic fields on the other hand are opposing at all times and can never be combined while being shifted back and forth.
Now with the presence of the secondary to collect the electric field an opposing field is formed in the secondary according to the Lenz Law that opposes any change what so ever. In order for this field to form the secondary has to be connected to a load before current or fields can form and flow. The fields will be opposing at least to one side of the secondaries and it is this side that pushes the secondary field across the primary unified electric field. This opposing secondary side and opposing primary allows motion be be induced into the secondary which then moves across the unified electric field as motion inducing current flow. The other primary coupled to the other end of the secondary as their fields are not opposing and attract.
Then when the end of the secondary is reach the opposite takes place the once increasing primary is now reducing and the reducing primary is now increasing thus starting the process all over yet in opposite direction. Thus the unified electric field is reversed and flowing in the opposite direction as is the current in the secondary. The once opposing field between the secondary and the primary doing the pushing is now coupled and the once coupled is now opposing and as such pushed the secondary field to the opposite end.
This continuous shifting created an electromotive force just like the standard rotating generator yet with no moving parts or rotation. All that is required for an EMF to take place according to Michael Faraday in 1831 is motion, either increasing or decreasing and this is definitely taking place in the Figuera device whether you think it is or not. The only reason it is not main stream is two fold. One is suppression and the other is the fact that this device is simple in operation yet simplex in duplication getting all known parameters exactly right.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 10, 2022 21:41:42 GMT -6
I would like to ask people and especially those brain dead EE people put there what is the meaning of this statement taken directly from an EE or Physics site. " According to Faraday’s Law, any change in this magnetic flux linkage produces a self-induced voltage in the single coil" This is even when a steady state current is present, it said NOTHING of AC what so EVER. So please tell me people and especially you Physics EE people what does that mean. How bout I yell you what it mean in plain f-in English.
It means that if "ANY" addition or subtraction to the flux linkage of said coil will in fact produce a self induced voltage in said coil and according to the Lanz Law it will oppose the current flow that created it in the first place. I repeat "ANY" change whether it it Magnetically or physically as in the winding count will in fact oppose any change to it.. Does not Figuera active inductor controller constitute a change in winding count as per the rotating brush?. Does it not constitute a change in flux linkage as per Farday's laws of induction in 1831?. You damn right it does!. Just because the device is DC does not mean it can't have inductive reactance.
If you have a coil running a certain amount of current through it and you suddenly change the winding count of said coil the inductance will in fact increase and the current flow will decrease. Now do the same but just the opposite, subtract windings with the inductance decreasing and the current flow will in fact increase.
Now put this all together and have an ongoing increase and decrease in flux linking and the end results will be an ongoing increase and decrease of flux which is the opposition to the original current flow. This will cause the current to rise and fall just like an AC sine wave and thus falls under inductive reactance all day long.
So I have to ask you, Can an active inductor controller control the flow of current of two feeds. You damn right it can according to Faraday himself. Unless of course you think you are smarter the Mr Faraday himself whom wrote the Law in the first place. ROTFLMAO!
CHECK AND MATE MY FRIENDS! Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 15, 2022 14:24:30 GMT -6
The previous post from Bigeasy somehow had gotten deleted and this was my answer to that post.
Quote: "The only distributor close to the patent is that of Marathonman." Ha,ha,ha!, imagine that!, lots and lots of brain dead people on the net and in forums that NEVER LISTEN!. Quote: "question: Does this variation in contact duration have an influence on the shape of the induced flux?". Absolutely!, as I have stated for many years. The contacts are on longer on the ends then the ones in the middle therefore the ends will have an inductive roll off and thus the nice curved sine wave peak output on the secondary. If not for this inductive roll off the secondary output would be a zig zag output like the below graph. AS for adding a pic either use the insert image next to the email button on the top right of the screen for a hosting site of the pic. Or use the edit attachments in the upper right corner. Upload the pic the hit add attachment and it will upload to the where the curser is located on the screen THANK you for your intelligent observation of the Figuera device. There are so many researchers trying to build the device with no clue as to it's understand of the operation of the device. You are one of the first to acknowledge this right off the batt. Congratulation!. And of course the core has to be closed core to preserve the flux inside part G otherwise it would be very lossy and require a huge part G. PS. Welcome to the forum! Many Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 15, 2022 14:37:16 GMT -6
I do not know what happened to your post bigeasy. I replied to your post and all of the sudden your post disappeared completely. I suspect foul play and i am contacting proboard Admin for possible solutions. Unless of course you deleted your post but i see no evidence of that. Please repost if you can if u remember what u posted.
I am upset as this has never happened before. Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by bigeasy on Aug 16, 2022 0:58:19 GMT -6
Hello Marathonman
I ask you to excuse me, indeed I had posted a message for a question concerning the rotary distributor. I realized after you had dealt with this question in "Mechanical Tech info" on February 7, 2022. subject to obtain a sinusoid with the rotary distributor, I noticed that other Figuera builders use point contacts which does not give a nice sinusoid. so I deleted the post.
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 16, 2022 15:39:10 GMT -6
That's quite all right Bigeasy, Most others do not read entire site first either although very helpful. I would of been fine to leave as is. Many, may builders to not grasp this idea of making sinusoidal wave in secondary and rush into building. That is why I spent many, many years on study a lone. you are one of the first to recognize the built in feature in the mechanical and as such needs to be transferred to the electronic. This I have done with shifting two bits at a time and ends for 5 times longer.
The whole point to to gradually increase the inductive reactance of one side and reduce the other at the same time. This increases and decreases the current flow of both feeds in complete unison. Thus shifting the opposing magnetic fields back and forth over the secondary.
The bottom line is to give DC AC like qualities using inductive reactance to control current flow of both sets of electromagnets.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Aug 17, 2022 10:24:09 GMT -6
I still laugh to this day when I hear of people thinking part G is a resistive controller. I mean seriously, what moronic physics professor would build a device using heat death resistors and expect it to be over unity or self sustaining. Sorry but NOT happening in a million years. What Figuera did ingenious, using an inductor to control current flow of two feeds with the ability to store and release potential. thus preserving the exciting side potential with very little losses. Once the device is at full potential the secondary feed back replaces the losses to the exciting side and to give rise to amplification. Three sources of potential equal amplification in part G plain and simple.
Well ask yourself; "How do you control current flow using DC in the most efficient way possible". Well since you can't control current flow of DC using a static inductor you have to find other means to create an on going current increase and decrease. Since AC uses inductive reactance to control current flow it is the sine wave or rather the increase and decrease of current flow that creates inductive reactance thus the opposition to the original current flow. Which is exactly what an AC variac does.
Now according to Faraday in 1831 "Any change in this magnetic flux linkage produces a self-induced voltage in the single coil. So what this does as the brush rotates is exactly that, it changes the flux linking winding's on a continuous basis as the brush rotates, That is the opposition to the original current flow. SO bottom line, what does this mean??? It means that when you increase the flux linkage you increase the opposition to the original current flow thus decrease the current flow of that half of the active inductor controller. The opposite is true of the second feed to set S electromagnets, decreasing flux linkage increasing the current flow to those sets of electromagnets.
So what Figuera did was place a positive rotating brush on an active inductor controller splitting the inductor in two at the positive brush changing the flux linkage of two feeds simultaneously in complete unison giving DC frequency through increase and decrease of current flow. Thus using inductive reactance to control current flow and at the same time storing and releasing potential. This storing and releasing act as as a battery feeding the electromagnets along with the secondary feed back allowing the device to be self sustaining.
Since the device electromagnets are opposing they are not coupled like that if a transformer and do not have a direct influence on the primary exciting potential. Figuera used two electromagnets to influence a secondary without direct coupling producing a secondary output from the reduction of one electromagnet and rise of the other. The rising electromagnet is used to push the secondary field across the electric field produced by both electromagnets which mind you are in complete coherency. One increasing one decreasing will cause both Vector potentials ie..electric fields to be in the same direction.
All I am doing on the electronic side is trying to switch it electronically exactly as the rotating brush does so the device is completely non moving.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|