|
Post by cornboy on Feb 23, 2020 14:46:09 GMT -6
Hi Skyrob and all, i gather that your commutator and slip ring setup is so you can have stationary mounted brushes all round, if this is so you will need to carefully skim the whole shaft assy so there is absolutely no run out, which will cause sparking.
Any sort of sparking [ie switching on and off ]with this devise causes huge build up of energy that will melt brushes and all.
Regards Cornboy.
|
|
|
Post by cornboy on Feb 23, 2020 16:42:23 GMT -6
Excellent Skyrob.
|
|
emilp
New Member
Posts: 19
|
Post by emilp on Feb 24, 2020 4:00:34 GMT -6
"This is what i am talking about when referring to siphoning off of the magnetic fields. in the middle the opposite pole will jump to the other core when presented with the opposite pole. then to make matters worse we are compressing the field lines which will make it even worse. this is indicated in the red square. all poles have to be the same or the siphoning will take place with a reduced output." Field leaks between secondary coils adjacent to different polarizations can be reduced by isolating them with a Mu-Ferro plate, which isolates the respective magnetic field on each triplet level. All the best. EmilP
|
|
peter
New Member
Posts: 24
|
Post by peter on Feb 25, 2020 1:02:47 GMT -6
Wow Skyrob, that's one fine setup. what kind of motor spins the shaft???
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Feb 28, 2020 8:10:31 GMT -6
While this is true Emil Figuera did not use any isolation because his poles were all North.
Nice motor Skyrob, i used a motor that had sleeves that went bad very quick so anything with barrings is good. the motor i will be using has barrings at both ends for longevity and less vibration. Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by creasysee on Feb 28, 2020 15:28:55 GMT -6
Nice lift Creasysee lots of current though. Marathonman I'm not sure yet. The system primaries <-> part G looks like an oscillating LC circuit. So here can be very high reactance currents, that depend from q-factor, that reverse proportional active resistance. The reactive energy has no losses in the system. The active part only should be compensated by an external power supply. My latest calculations (not finished yet) give me 1.9 kW (6 Amps @ 320 V) of total power in the system and 119 W consumed from a power supply. (I restricted current because my core of part G has a power rating 2 kW only, I will try 10 more amps in tests.)
Regards, creasysee
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Feb 29, 2020 9:31:38 GMT -6
I myself do not think part G or the system in general is an LC circuit but i will agree part G has very high Q factor being it uses thicker wire which will reduce losses considerably. the core being closed will conserve the magnetic energy along with the thick wire will be darn near lossless as the fields are reducing and increasing not reversing like that of AC. the same goes for the primaries as they are only reduced and increased so no reversal of fields or losses associated with the use of AC. because of the reluctance in air from the return path of the magnetic fields the actual current or field intensity will be minimized in fluctuations of the stored field. even though we will be reducing on electromagnet the increasing electromagnet is compensated in intensity so the field intensity is retained. it was very ingenious of Figuera to figure out he could get AC like qualities into DC which then allowed him to control current. the attribute allowed the device to be very efficient.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by cornboy on Mar 1, 2020 19:09:00 GMT -6
Hi Skyrob and all, you can now upload video's to Brighteon.com just open a free account with them, they will not sensor any of your content, like youtube does.
Regards Cornboy.
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Mar 2, 2020 8:06:50 GMT -6
"AS PER PATENT"
No where in the patent does it mention massive amount of sliprings. i have always enjoyed the colorful imaginations of people over the last few years that gave me a good chuckle.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Mar 3, 2020 12:34:04 GMT -6
That is good to know about Brighteon, Youtube is getting ridiculous.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Mar 6, 2020 8:27:39 GMT -6
I am curious as to what you are trying to accomplish through the use of so many slip rings Skyrob. drag will be high with so many brushes. Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by cornboy on Mar 7, 2020 14:30:18 GMT -6
Looks a good and solid commutator test bed Skyrob, well done.
All the best Cornboy.
|
|
|
Post by Marathonman on Mar 8, 2020 6:51:14 GMT -6
True, good workmanship but building a proof of concept when you do not even understand the working parameters of the original design is completely insane then trying to improve the design on top of that. sounds like Einstein at his finest hour of disillusion. all i can say on that matter is good luck, you will need lots of it.
Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 16, 2020 8:10:37 GMT -6
How i missed it i have no idea. we have a new member Medeni that joined the Figuera ranks. welcome to the best forum on the net. i thought i had already posted this but i have been so busy i must have missed it. sorry for the confusion. after reading all that has been posted please feel free to ask any questions of areas of confusion.
welcome Medini, Regards, Marathonman
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 16, 2020 8:17:35 GMT -6
Clemente Figuera was discovered as far as i can tell 17 years ago so i have updated the banner to reflect this. being in the public domain for so long it can NOT be patent but can be built by everyone around the world to help humanity. please spread the word sharing this device with friends, neighbors and colleagues as Figuera had not one but two working devices presented to the patent office being his 1902 and 1908 patents that powered his lights in his home, a 20 Hp motor and the street lights in front of his home.
do NOT believe the BS. that free energy is not possible as it would be quite awkward if the world stop spinning tomorrow. NOT ! billions of year and still spinning as we live in a perpetual motion machine being our Universe.
Regards, Marathonman
|
|